SocioProbe: What, When, and Where Language Models Learn about Sociodemographics
Anne Lauscher, Federico Bianchi, Samuel R. Bowman, Dirk Hovy
Abstract
Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have outperformed other NLP models on a wide range of tasks. Opting for a more thorough understanding of their capabilities and inner workings, researchers have established the extend to which they capture lower-level knowledge like grammaticality, and mid-level semantic knowledge like factual understanding. However, there is still little understanding of their knowledge of higher-level aspects of language. In particular, despite the importance of sociodemographic aspects in shaping our language, the questions of whether, where, and how PLMs encode these aspects, e.g., gender or age, is still unexplored. We address this research gap by probing the sociodemographic knowledge of different single-GPU PLMs on multiple English data sets via traditional classifier probing and information-theoretic minimum description length probing. Our results show that PLMs do encode these sociodemographics, and that this knowledge is sometimes spread across the layers of some of the tested PLMs. We further conduct a multilingual analysis and investigate the effect of supplementary training to further explore to what extent, where, and with what amount of pre-training data the knowledge is encoded. Our overall results indicate that sociodemographic knowledge is still a major challenge for NLP. PLMs require large amounts of pre-training data to acquire the knowledge and models that excel in general language understanding do not seem to own more knowledge about these aspects.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0b0c843d-2d1f-49ae-8ee2-9216a53f8925Cited by top-tier papers2
- "Feels Feminine to Me": Understanding Perceived Gendered Style through Human AnnotationsHongyu Chen, Neele Falk, Michael Roth, Agnieszka FalenskaEMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Explainability and Interpretability of Multilingual Large Language Models: A SurveyLucas Resck, Isabelle Augenstein, Anna KorhonenEMNLP 2025
Builds on15
- ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than GeneratorsKevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, Christopher D. ManningICLR 2020 · 541 citations
- Predictive Biases in Natural Language Processing Models: A Conceptual Framework and OverviewDeven Shah, H. Andrew Schwartz, Dirk HovyACL 2020 · 93 citations
- Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPSu Lin Blodgett, Solon Barocas, Hal Daumé III, Hanna M. WallachACL 2020 · 68 citations
- Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description LengthElena Voita, Ivan TitovEMNLP 2020 · 34 citations
- Probing for Referential Information in Language ModelsIonut-Teodor Sorodoc, Kristina Gulordava, Gemma BoledaACL 2020 · 31 citations
Related papers
- Probing Linguistic Information for Logical Inference in Pre-trained Language ModelsZeming Chen, Qiyue GaoAAAI 2022 · 11 citations
- Beyond Demographics: Fine-tuning Large Language Models to Predict Individuals' Subjective Text PerceptionsMatthias Orlikowski, Jiaxin Pei, Paul Röttger, Philipp Cimiano et al.ACL 2025 · 34 citations
- Metaphors in Pre-Trained Language Models: Probing and Generalization Across Datasets and LanguagesEhsan Aghazadeh, Mohsen Fayyaz, Yadollah YaghoobzadehACL 2022
- Can Pre-trained Language Models Interpret Similes as Smart as Human?Qianyu He, Sijie Cheng, Zhixu Li, Rui Xie et al.ACL 2022
- Prompting Language Models for Linguistic StructureTerra Blevins, Hila Gonen, Luke ZettlemoyerACL 2023 · 15 citations
