TrueTeacher: Learning Factual Consistency Evaluation with Large Language Models
Zorik Gekhman, Jonathan Herzig, Roee Aharoni, Chen Elkind, Idan Szpektor
Abstract
Factual consistency evaluation is often conducted using Natural Language Inference (NLI) models, yet these models exhibit limited success in evaluating summaries. Previous work improved such models with synthetic training data. However, the data is typically based on perturbed human-written summaries, which often differ in their characteristics from real model-generated summaries and have limited coverage of possible factual errors. Alternatively, large language models (LLMs) have recently shown promising results in directly evaluating generative tasks, but are too computationally expensive for practical use. Motivated by these limitations, we introduce TrueTeacher, a method for generating synthetic data by annotating diverse model-generated summaries using a LLM. Unlike prior work, TrueTeacher does not rely on human-written summaries, and is multilingual by nature. Experiments on the TRUE benchmark show that a student model trained using our data, substantially outperforms both the state-of-the-art model with similar capacity, and the LLM teacher. In a systematic study, we compare TrueTeacher to existing synthetic data generation methods and demonstrate its superiority and robustness to domain-shift. We also show that our method generalizes to multilingual scenarios. Lastly, we release our largescale synthetic dataset (1.4M examples), generated using TrueTeacher, and a checkpoint trained on this data. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0a5ed164-e198-421c-b541-75fc969e27afCited by top-tier papers32
- Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?Zorik Gekhman, Gal Yona, Roee Aharoni, Matan Eyal et al.EMNLP 2024 · 53 citations
- IRCAN: Mitigating Knowledge Conflicts in LLM Generation via Identifying and Reweighting Context-Aware NeuronsDan Shi, Renren Jin, Tianhao Shen, Weilong Dong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 44 citations
- LM vs LM: Detecting Factual Errors via Cross ExaminationRoi Cohen, May Hamri, Mor Geva, Amir GlobersonEMNLP 2023 · 41 citations
- Knowledge Conflicts for LLMs: A SurveyRongwu Xu, Zehan Qi, Zhijiang Guo, Cunxiang Wang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 38 citations
- From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgeDawei Li, Bohan Jiang, Liangjie Huang, Alimohammad Beigi et al.EMNLP 2025 · 37 citations
Builds on13
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
- Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language UnderstandingYixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal et al.ACL 2020 · 602 citations
- G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human AlignmentYang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 549 citations
Related papers
- Truth Knows No Language: Evaluating Truthfulness Beyond EnglishBlanca Calvo Figueras, Eneko Sagarzazu, Julen Etxaniz, Jeremy Barnes et al.ACL 2025
- Are LLMs Better than Reported? Detecting Label Errors and Mitigating Their Effect on Model PerformanceOmer Nahum, Nitay Calderon, Orgad Keller, Idan Szpektor et al.EMNLP 2025 · 9 citations
- SummEdits: Measuring LLM Ability at Factual Reasoning Through The Lens of SummarizationPhilippe Laban, Wojciech Kryscinski, Divyansh Agarwal, Alexander R. Fabbri et al.EMNLP 2023 · 29 citations
- Autonomous Evaluation of LLMs for Truth Maintenance and Reasoning TasksRushang Karia, Daniel Bramblett, Daksh Dobhal, Siddharth SrivastavaICLR 2025
- WeCheck: Strong Factual Consistency Checker via Weakly Supervised LearningWenhao Wu, Wei Li, Xinyan Xiao, Jiachen Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 3 citations
