Focus on Your Question! Interpreting and Mitigating Toxic CoT Problems in Commonsense Reasoning
Jiachun Li, Pengfei Cao, Chenhao Wang, Zhuoran Jin, Yubo Chen, Daojian Zeng, Kang Liu, Jun Zhao
Abstract
Large language models exhibit high-level commonsense reasoning abilities, especially with enhancement methods like Chain-of-Thought (CoT). However, we find these CoT-like methods lead to a considerable number of originally correct answers turning wrong, which we define as the Toxic CoT problem. To interpret and mitigate this problem, we first utilize attribution tracing and causal tracing methods to probe the internal working mechanism of the LLM during CoT reasoning. Through comparisons, we prove that the model exhibits information loss from the question in the shallow attention layers when generating rationales or answers. Based on the probing results, we design a novel method called RIDERS (Residual decodIng and sERial-position Swap), which compensates for the information deficit in the model from both decoding and serial-position perspectives. Through extensive experiments on multiple commonsense reasoning benchmarks, we validate that this method not only significantly eliminates Toxic CoT problems (decreased by 23.6%), but also effectively improves the model's overall commonsense reasoning performance (increased by 5.5%).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0a26316d-45cf-4cef-b64b-4f67a7d2aa58Cited by top-tier papers10
- Instance-adaptive Zero-shot Chain-of-Thought PromptingXiaosong Yuan, Chen Shen, Shaotian Yan, Xiaofeng Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 46 citations
- MMR-Life: Piecing Together Real-life Scenes for Multimodal Multi-image ReasoningJiachun Li, Shaoping Huang, Zhuoran Jin, Chenlong Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Tracing and Dissecting How LLMs Recall Factual Knowledge for Real World QuestionsYiqun Wang, Chaoqun Wan, Sile Hu, Yonggang Zhang et al.ACL 2025 · 2 citations
- OCEAN: Offline Chain-of-thought Evaluation and Alignment in Large Language ModelsJunda Wu, Xintong Li, Ruoyu Wang, Yu Xia et al.ICLR 2025
- Don't Take Things Out of Context: Attention Intervention for Enhancing Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language ModelsShaotian Yan, Chen Shen, Wenxiao Wang, Liang Xie et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on21
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
Related papers
- Causal Sufficiency and Necessity Improves Chain-of-Thought ReasoningXiangning Yu, Zhuohan Wang, Linyi Yang, Haoxuan Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 19 citations
- Understanding Chain-of-Thought in LLMs through Information TheoryJean-Francois Ton, Muhammad Faaiz Taufiq, Yang LiuICML 2025
- Nash CoT: Multi-Path Inference with Preference EquilibriumZiqi Zhang, Cunxiang Wang, Xiao Xiong, Yue Zhang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- DecepChain: Inducing Deceptive Reasoning in Large Language ModelsWei Shen, Han Wang, Haoyu Li, Huan ZhangICML 2026 · 4 citations
- On Second Thought, Let's Not Think Step by Step! Bias and Toxicity in Zero-Shot ReasoningOmar Shaikh, Hongxin Zhang, William Barr Held, Michael S. Bernstein et al.ACL 2023 · 61 citations
