Nash CoT: Multi-Path Inference with Preference Equilibrium
Ziqi Zhang, Cunxiang Wang, Xiao Xiong, Yue Zhang, Donglin Wang
Abstract
Chain of thought (CoT) is a reasoning framework that can enhance the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) on complex inference tasks.In particular, among various studies related to CoT, multi-path inference stands out as a simple yet effective improvement.However, there is no optimal setting for the number of inference paths.Therefore, we have to increase the number of inference paths to obtain better results, which in turn increases the inference cost.To address this limitation, we can utilize question-related role templates to guide LLMs into relevant roles, thereby increasing the possibility of correct inferences for each path and further reducing dependence on the number of inference paths while improving reasoning accuracy.However, placing LLMs into specific roles may reduce their reasoning diversity and performance on a few tasks where role dependence is low.To alleviate the excessive immersion of the LLM into a specific role, we propose Nash CoT by constructing a competitive system on each path that balances the generation from role-specific LLMs' and the general LLMs' generation, thereby ensuring both effective role adoption and diversity in LLM generation further maintaining the performance of multi-path inference while reducing the requirement of the number of inference paths.We evaluate Nash CoT across various inference tasks, including Arabic Reasoning, Commonsense Question Answering, and Symbolic Inference, achieving results that are comparable to or better than those of multi-path CoT with the equal number of inference paths.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5dee0ec2-105e-466f-b421-8da163881f12Cited by top-tier papers2
- Reasoning Through Execution: Unifying Process and Outcome Rewards for Code GenerationZhuohao Yu, Weizheng Gu, Yidong Wang, Xingru Jiang et al.ICML 2025
- MAGO: Beyond Fixed Hyperparameters with Multi-Objective Pareto Optimization for Hybrid LLM ReasoningHongcheng Ding, Xuanze Zhao, Ruiting Deng, Shamsul Nahar Abdullah et al.ICLR 2026
Builds on11
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
Related papers
- Causal Sufficiency and Necessity Improves Chain-of-Thought ReasoningXiangning Yu, Zhuohan Wang, Linyi Yang, Haoxuan Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 19 citations
- Unlocking the Capabilities of Thought: A Reasoning Boundary Framework to Quantify and Optimize Chain-of-ThoughtQiguang Chen, Libo Qin, Jiaqi Wang, Jingxuan Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 104 citations
- Fine-Tuning on Diverse Reasoning Chains Drives Within-Inference CoT Refinement in LLMsHaritz Puerto, Tilek Chubakov, Xiaodan Zhu, Harish Tayyar Madabushi et al.ACL 2025 · 13 citations
- To CoT or not to CoT? Chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoningZayne Rea Sprague, Fangcong Yin, Juan Diego Rodriguez, Dongwei Jiang et al.ICLR 2025
- Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What MattersBoshi Wang, Sewon Min, Xiang Deng, Jiaming Shen et al.ACL 2023 · 100 citations
