OMG: Opacity Matters in Material Modeling with Gaussian Splatting
Silong Yong, Venkata Nagarjun Pudureddiyur Manivannan, Bernhard Kerbl, Zifu Wan, Simon Stepputtis, Katia P. Sycara, Yaqi Xie
Abstract
Decomposing geometry, materials and lighting from a set of images, namely inverse rendering, has been a long-standing problem in computer vision and graphics. Recent advances in neural rendering enable photo-realistic and plausible inverse rendering results. The emergence of 3D Gaussian Splatting has boosted it to the next level by showing real-time rendering potentials. An intuitive finding is that the models used for inverse rendering do not take into account the dependency of opacity w.r.t. material properties, namely cross section, as suggested by optics. Therefore, we develop a novel approach that adds this dependency to the modeling itself. Inspired by radiative transfer, we augment the opacity term by introducing a neural network that takes as input material properties to provide modeling of cross section and a physically correct activation function. The gradients for material properties are therefore not only from color but also from opacity, facilitating a constraint for their optimization. Therefore, the proposed method incorporates more accurate physical properties compared to previous works. We implement our method into 3 different baselines that use Gaussian Splatting for inverse rendering and achieve significant improvements universally in terms of novel view synthesis and material modeling. Code is available at https://github.com/SilongYong/OMG * Joint collaborators in research inception
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 096f759f-9b1d-45b0-941e-e6d6c4843b3bCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on32
- 3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field RenderingBernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimkühler, George DrettakisSIGGRAPH 2023 · 5,687 citations
- Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encodingThomas Müller, Alex Evans, Christoph Schied, Alexander KellerSIGGRAPH 2022 · 4,089 citations
- Mip-NeRF: A Multiscale Representation for Anti-Aliasing Neural Radiance FieldsJonathan T. Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Matthew Tancik, Peter Hedman et al.ICCV 2021 · 2,700 citations
- Mip-NeRF 360: Unbounded Anti-Aliased Neural Radiance FieldsJonathan T. Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P. Srinivasan et al.CVPR 2022 · 1,603 citations
- Volume Rendering of Neural Implicit SurfacesLior Yariv, Jiatao Gu, Yoni Kasten, Yaron LipmanNeurIPS 2021 · 1,421 citations
Related papers
- PBR-NeRF: Inverse Rendering with Physics-Based Neural FieldsSean Wu, Shamik Basu, Tim Broedermann, Luc Van Gool et al.CVPR 2025
- GS-IR: 3D Gaussian Splatting for Inverse RenderingZhihao Liang, Qi Zhang, Ying Feng, Ying Shan et al.CVPR 2024
- GeoSplatting: Towards Geometry Guided Gaussian Splatting for Physically-Based Inverse RenderingKai Ye, Chong Gao, Guanbin Li, Wenzheng Chen et al.ICCV 2025 · 6 citations
- SGS-Intrinsic: Semantic-Invariant Gaussian Splatting for Sparse-View Indoor Inverse RenderingJiahao Niu, Rongjia Zheng, Wenju Xu, Wei-Shi Zheng et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- GauUpdate: New Object Insertion in 3D Gaussian Fields with Consistent Global IlluminationChengwei Ren, Fan Zhang, Liangchao Xu, Liang Pan et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
