Enhancing Safe Exploration Using Safety State Augmentation
Aivar Sootla, Alexander I. Cowen-Rivers, Jun Wang, Haitham Bou-Ammar
Abstract
Safe exploration is a challenging and important problem in model-free reinforcement learning (RL). Often the safety cost is sparse and unknown, which unavoidably leads to constraint violations -a phenomenon ideally to be avoided in safetycritical applications. We tackle this problem by augmenting the state-space with a safety state, which is nonnegative if and only if the constraint is satisfied. The value of this state also serves as a distance toward constraint violation, while its initial value indicates the available safety budget. This idea allows us to derive policies for scheduling the safety budget during training. We call our approach Simmer (Safe policy IMproveMEnt for RL) to reflect the careful nature of these schedules. We apply this idea to two safe RL problems: RL with constraints imposed on an average cost, and RL with constraints imposed on a cost with probability one. Our experiments suggest that "simmering" a safe algorithm can improve safety during training for both settings. We further show that Simmer can stabilize training and improve the performance of safe RL with average constraints.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 090c6d46-74cb-41cb-8dcd-6e8dfbdfd9bdCited by top-tier papers5
- Compositional Policy Learning in Stochastic Control Systems with Formal GuaranteesDorde Zikelic, Mathias Lechner, Abhinav Verma, Krishnendu Chatterjee et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 31 citations
- Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning with Step-wise Violation ConstraintsNuoya Xiong, Yihan Du, Longbo HuangNeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- On the Robustness of Safe Reinforcement Learning under Observational PerturbationsZuxin Liu, Zijian Guo, Zhepeng Cen, Huan Zhang et al.ICLR 2023 · 9 citations
- AED: Adaptable Error Detection for Few-shot Imitation PolicyJia-Fong Yeh, Kuo-Han Hung, Pang-Chi Lo, Chi-Ming Chung et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
- A Provable Approach for End-to-End Safe Reinforcement LearningAkifumi Wachi, Kohei Miyaguchi, Takumi Tanabe, Rei Sato et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on9
- Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian MethodsAdam Stooke, Joshua Achiam, Pieter AbbeelICML 2020 · 403 citations
- Reward-Free Exploration for Reinforcement LearningChi Jin, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Max Simchowitz, Tiancheng YuICML 2020 · 226 citations
- WCSAC: Worst-Case Soft Actor Critic for Safety-Constrained Reinforcement LearningQisong Yang, Thiago D. Simão, Simon H. Tindemans, Matthijs T. J. SpaanAAAI 2021 · 168 citations
- Constrained Variational Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement LearningZuxin Liu, Zhepeng Cen, Vladislav Isenbaev, Wei Liu et al.ICML 2022 · 112 citations
- Safe Reinforcement Learning via Curriculum InductionMatteo Turchetta, Andrey Kolobov, Shital Shah, Andreas Krause et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 109 citations
Related papers
- Constrained Markov Decision Processes via Backward Value FunctionsHarsh Satija, Philip Amortila, Joelle PineauICML 2020 · 58 citations
- Safety Representations for Safer Policy LearningKaustubh Mani, Vincent Mai, Charlie Gauthier, Annie S. Chen et al.ICLR 2025
- Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Advantage-Based InterventionNolan Wagener, Byron Boots, Ching-An ChengICML 2021 · 66 citations
- SafeMPO: Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Probabilistic Incremental ImprovementAlexander Mattick, Dominik Seuß, Christopher MutschlerICLR 2026
- Imitate the Good and Avoid the Bad: An Incremental Approach to Safe Reinforcement LearningHuy Hoang, Tien Mai, Pradeep VarakanthamAAAI 2024 · 8 citations
