Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning with Step-wise Violation Constraints
Nuoya Xiong, Yihan Du, Longbo Huang
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate a novel safe reinforcement learning problem with step-wise violation constraints. Our problem differs from existing works in that we consider stricter step-wise violation constraints and do not assume the existence of safe actions, making our formulation more suitable for safety-critical applications which need to ensure safety in all decision steps and may not always possess safe actions, e.g., robot control and autonomous driving. We propose a novel algorithm SUCBVI, which guarantees step-wise violation and regret. Lower bounds are provided to validate the optimality in both violation and regret performance with respect to and . Moreover, we further study a novel safe reward-free exploration problem with step-wise violation constraints. For this problem, we design an -PAC algorithm SRF-UCRL, which achieves nearly state-of-the-art sample complexity , and guarantees violation during the exploration. The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our algorithms in safety performance, and corroborate our theoretical results.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0665b541-7299-408f-bb3c-023e60fa571bCited by top-tier papers6
- Iterative Reachability Estimation for Safe Reinforcement LearningMilan Ganai, Zheng Gong, Chenning Yu, Sylvia L. Herbert et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 56 citations
- Dynamic Model Predictive Shielding for Provably Safe Reinforcement LearningArko Banerjee, Kia Rahmani, Joydeep Biswas, Isil DilligNeurIPS 2024 · 24 citations
- Verified Safe Reinforcement Learning for Neural Network Dynamic ModelsJunlin Wu, Huan Zhang, Yevgeniy VorobeychikNeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations
- One Subgoal at a Time: Zero-Shot Generalization to Arbitrary Linear Temporal Logic Requirements in Multi-Task Reinforcement LearningZijian Guo, Ilker Isik, H. M. Sabbir Ahmad, Wenchao LiNeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Flipping-based Policy for Chance-Constrained Markov Decision ProcessesXun Shen, Shuo Jiang, Akifumi Wachi, Kazumune Hashimoto et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
Builds on19
- Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian MethodsAdam Stooke, Joshua Achiam, Pieter AbbeelICML 2020 · 403 citations
- Natural Policy Gradient Primal-Dual Method for Constrained Markov Decision ProcessesDongsheng Ding, Kaiqing Zhang, Tamer Basar, Mihailo R. JovanovicNeurIPS 2020 · 252 citations
- IPO: Interior-Point Policy Optimization under ConstraintsYongshuai Liu, Jiaxin Ding, Xin LiuAAAI 2020 · 231 citations
- Reward-Free Exploration for Reinforcement LearningChi Jin, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Max Simchowitz, Tiancheng YuICML 2020 · 226 citations
- Safe Reinforcement Learning in Constrained Markov Decision ProcessesAkifumi Wachi, Yanan SuiICML 2020 · 190 citations
Related papers
- Safe Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function ApproximationSanae Amani, Christos Thrampoulidis, Lin YangICML 2021 · 42 citations
- A Near-Optimal Algorithm for Safe Reinforcement Learning Under Instantaneous Hard ConstraintsMing Shi, Yingbin Liang, Ness B. ShroffICML 2023 · 18 citations
- Learning Policies with Zero or Bounded Constraint Violation for Constrained MDPsTao Liu, Ruida Zhou, Dileep Kalathil, Panganamala R. Kumar et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 110 citations
- CRPO: A New Approach for Safe Reinforcement Learning with Convergence GuaranteeTengyu Xu, Yingbin Liang, Guanghui LanICML 2021 · 171 citations
- Near-Optimal Sample Complexity for Online Constrained MDPsChang Liu, Yunfan Li, Lin F. YangNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
