ALLabel: Three-stage Active Learning for LLM-based Entity Recognition using Demonstration Retrieval
Zihan Chen, Lei Shi, Weize Wu, Qiji Zhou, Yue Zhang
Abstract
Many contemporary data-driven research efforts in the natural sciences, such as chemistry and materials science, require large-scale, highperformance entity recognition from scientific datasets. Large language models (LLMs) have increasingly been adopted to solve the entity recognition task, with the same trend being observed on all-spectrum NLP tasks. The prevailing entity recognition LLMs rely on finetuned technology, yet the fine-tuning process often incurs significant cost. To achieve a best performance-cost trade-off, we propose ALLabel, a three-stage framework designed to select the most informative and representative samples in preparing the demonstrations for LLM modeling. The annotated examples are used to construct a ground-truth retrieval corpus for LLM in-context learning. By sequentially employing three distinct active learning strategies, ALLabel consistently outperforms all baselines under the same annotation budget across three specialized domain datasets. Experimental results also demonstrate that selectively annotating only 5%-10% of the dataset with ALLabel can achieve performance comparable to the method annotating the entire dataset. Further analyses and ablation studies verify the effectiveness and generalizability of our proposal.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 083ba0b7-eeec-445a-96f1-055e5600c073Builds on7
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?Sewon Min, Xinxi Lyu, Ari Holtzman, Mikel Artetxe et al.EMNLP 2022 · 634 citations
- Compositional Exemplars for In-context LearningJiacheng Ye, Zhiyong Wu, Jiangtao Feng, Tao Yu et al.ICML 2023 · 188 citations
- Diverse Demonstrations Improve In-context Compositional GeneralizationItay Levy, Ben Bogin, Jonathan BerantACL 2023 · 51 citations
- Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language ModelsShizhe Diao, Pengcheng Wang, Yong Lin, Rui Pan et al.ACL 2024 · 40 citations
Related papers
- FreeAL: Towards Human-Free Active Learning in the Era of Large Language ModelsRuixuan Xiao, Yiwen Dong, Junbo Zhao, Runze Wu et al.EMNLP 2023 · 9 citations
- Interactive Multi-fidelity Learning for Cost-effective Adaptation of Language Model with Sparse Human SupervisionJiaxin Zhang, Zhuohang Li, Kamalika Das, Kumar SricharanNeurIPS 2023 · 6 citations
- Entity Alignment with Noisy Annotations from Large Language ModelsShengyuan Chen, Qinggang Zhang, Junnan Dong, Wen Hua et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 44 citations
- Selective Annotation Makes Language Models Better Few-Shot LearnersHongjin Su, Jungo Kasai, Chen Henry Wu, Weijia Shi et al.ICLR 2023 · 63 citations
- GuideNER: Annotation Guidelines Are Better than Examples for In-Context Named Entity RecognitionShizhou Huang, Bo Xu, Yang Yu, Changqun Li et al.AAAI 2025 · 1 citation
