Who am I, and who are you, and who are we? A Scientometric Analysis of Gender and Geography in HCI
Dana McKay, Huiwen Zhang, George Buchanan
Abstract
Conference authorship, attendance and presentation is a key measure of quality in the HCI academic, yet we know conferences are not equally accessible for reasons that have nothing to do with quality. In this paper we examine two axes of diversity: gender, and geographic location (of both authors and conferences) and examine how they affect participation at major HCI conferences. Diversity in a group is associated with better outcomes from its work, and HCI has made numerous contributions to increasing representation in other communities. Reflecting on our own situation can produce recommendations for the planning of future HCI conferences, and identify challenges of representation that the HCI community should endeavor to address.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Related papers
- Diagnosing Bias in the Gender Representation of HCI Research Participants: How it Happens and Where We AreAnna Offenwanger, Alan John Milligan, Minsuk Chang, Julia Bullard et al.CHI 2021 · 51 citations
- Representation of women in HPC conferencesEitan Frachtenberg, Rhody D. KanerSC 2021 · 7 citations
- Why, when, and from whom: considerations for collecting and reporting race and ethnicity data in HCIYiqun T. Chen, Angela D. R. Smith, Katharina Reinecke, Alexandra ToCHI 2023 · 20 citations
- Gender in 30 Years of IEEE VisualizationNatkamon Tovanich, Pierre Dragicevic, Petra IsenbergIEEE VIS 2021 · 15 citations
- "It's about Research. It's Not about Language": Understanding and Designing for Mitigating Non-Native English-Speaking Presenters' Challenges in Live Q&A Sessions at Academic ConferencesLingyuan Li, Ge Wang, Guo FreemanCHI 2025 · 4 citations
