lpNTK: Better Generalisation with Less Data via Sample Interaction During Learning
Shangmin Guo, Yi Ren, Stefano V. Albrecht, Kenny Smith
Abstract
Although much research has been done on proposing new models or loss functions to improve the generalisation of artificial neural networks (ANNs), less attention has been directed to the impact of the training data on generalisation. In this work, we start from approximating the interaction between samples, i.e. how learning one sample would modify the model's prediction on other samples. Through analysing the terms involved in weight updates in supervised learning, we find that labels influence the interaction between samples. Therefore, we propose the labelled pseudo Neural Tangent Kernel (lpNTK) which takes label information into consideration when measuring the interactions between samples. We first prove that lpNTK asymptotically converges to the empirical neural tangent kernel in terms of the Frobenius norm under certain assumptions. Secondly, we illustrate how lpNTK helps to understand learning phenomena identified in previous work, specifically the learning difficulty of samples and forgetting events during learning. Moreover, we also show that using lpNTK to identify and remove poisoning training samples does not hurt the generalisation performance of ANNs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 078d4bcc-ffc6-4751-acad-4686f338f540Cited by top-tier papers2
- Learning Dynamics of LLM FinetuningYi Ren, Danica J. SutherlandICLR 2025
- Efficient Graph Continual Learning via Lightweight Graph Neural Tangent Kernels-based Dataset DistillationRihong Qiu, Xinke Jiang, Yuchen Fang, Hongbin Lai et al.ICML 2025
Builds on20
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in TrainingMansheej Paul, Surya Ganguli, Gintare Karolina DziugaiteNeurIPS 2021 · 806 citations
- Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningBen Sorscher, Robert Geirhos, Shashank Shekhar, Surya Ganguli et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 720 citations
- Dataset Condensation with Gradient MatchingBo Zhao, Konda Reddy Mopuri, Hakan BilenICLR 2021 · 684 citations
- When Vision Transformers Outperform ResNets without Pre-training or Strong Data AugmentationsXiangning Chen, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Boqing GongICLR 2022 · 388 citations
Related papers
- The Surprising Effectiveness of Infinite-Width NTKs for Characterizing and Improving Model TrainingJoshua DeOliveira, Walter Gerych, Elke A. RundensteinerAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Label-Aware Neural Tangent Kernel: Toward Better Generalization and Local ElasticityShuxiao Chen, Hangfeng He, Weijie J. SuNeurIPS 2020 · 25 citations
- Few-shot Backdoor Attacks via Neural Tangent KernelsJonathan Hayase, Sewoong OhICLR 2023 · 5 citations
- Shortcut Features as Top Eigenfunctions of NTK: A Linear Neural Network Case and MoreJinwoo Lim, Suhyun Kim, Soo-Mook MoonNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- NTK-SAP: Improving neural network pruning by aligning training dynamicsYite Wang, Dawei Li, Ruoyu SunICLR 2023 · 2 citations
