A Deeper Look into RowHammer's Sensitivities: Experimental Analysis of Real DRAM Chipsand Implications on Future Attacks and Defenses
Lois Orosa, Abdullah Giray Yaglikçi, Haocong Luo, Ataberk Olgun, Jisung Park, Hasan Hassan, Minesh Patel, Jeremie S. Kim, Onur Mutlu
Abstract
RowHammer is a circuit-level DRAM vulnerability where repeatedly accessing (i.e., hammering) a DRAM row can cause bit flips in physically nearby rows. The RowHammer vulnerability worsens as DRAM cell size and cell-to-cell spacing shrink. Recent studies demonstrate that modern DRAM chips, including chips previously marketed as RowHammer-safe, are even more vulnerable to RowHammer than older chips such that the required hammer count to cause a bit flip has reduced by more than 10X in the last decade. Therefore, it is essential to develop a better understanding and in-depth insights into the RowHammer vulnerability of modern DRAM chips to more effectively secure current and future systems.
Our goal in this paper is to provide insights into fundamental properties of the RowHammer vulnerability that are not yet rigorously studied by prior works, but can potentially be 𝑖) exploited to develop more effective RowHammer attacks or 𝑖𝑖) leveraged to design more effective and efficient defense mechanisms. To this end, we present an experimental characterization using 248 DDR4 and 24 DDR3 modern DRAM chips from four major DRAM manufacturers demonstrating how the RowHammer effects vary with three fundamental properties: 1) DRAM chip temperature, 2) aggressor row active time, and 3) victim DRAM cell's physical location. Among our 16 new observations, we highlight that a RowHammer bit flip 1) is very likely to occur in a bounded range, specific to each DRAM cell (e.g., 5.4% of the vulnerable DRAM cells exhibit errors in the range 70 °C to 90 °C), 2) is more likely to occur if the aggressor row is active for longer time (e.g., RowHammer vulnerability increases by 36% if we keep a DRAM row active for 15 column accesses), and 3) is more likely to occur in certain physical regions of the DRAM module under attack (e.g., 5% of the rows are 2x more vulnerable than the remaining 95% of the rows). Our study has important practical implications on future RowHammer attacks and defenses. We describe and analyze the implications of our new findings by proposing three future RowHammer attack and six future RowHammer defense improvements.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0773b47c-6e78-45e8-86d4-04f1f750dd5eCited by top-tier papers29
- BLACKSMITH: Scalable Rowhammering in the Frequency DomainPatrick Jattke, Victor van der Veen, Pietro Frigo, Stijn Gunter et al.S&P 2022 · 140 citations
- ProTRR: Principled yet Optimal In-DRAM Target Row RefreshMichele Marazzi, Patrick Jattke, Flavien Solt, Kaveh RazaviS&P 2022 · 101 citations
- Uncovering In-DRAM RowHammer Protection Mechanisms: A New Methodology, Custom RowHammer Patterns, and ImplicationsHasan Hassan, Yahya Can Tugrul, Jeremie S. Kim, Victor van der Veen et al.MICRO 2021 · 79 citations
- RowPress: Amplifying Read Disturbance in Modern DRAM ChipsHaocong Luo, Ataberk Olgun, Abdullah Giray Yaglikçi, Yahya Can Tugrul et al.ISCA 2023 · 71 citations
- HiRA: Hidden Row Activation for Reducing Refresh Latency of Off-the-Shelf DRAM ChipsAbdullah Giray Yaglikçi, Ataberk Olgun, Minesh Patel, Haocong Luo et al.MICRO 2022 · 43 citations
Builds on22
- DRAMA: Exploiting DRAM Addressing for Cross-CPU AttacksPeter Pessl, Daniel Gruss, Clémentine Maurice, Michael Schwarz et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 500 citations
- Drammer: Deterministic Rowhammer Attacks on Mobile PlatformsVictor van der Veen, Yanick Fratantonio, Martina Lindorfer, Daniel Gruss et al.CCS 2016 · 381 citations
- Another Flip in the Wall of Rowhammer DefensesDaniel Gruss, Moritz Lipp, Michael Schwarz, Daniel Genkin et al.S&P 2018 · 288 citations
- TRRespass: Exploiting the Many Sides of Target Row RefreshPietro Frigo, Emanuele Vannacci, Hasan Hassan, Victor van der Veen et al.S&P 2020 · 274 citations
- One Bit Flips, One Cloud Flops: Cross-VM Row Hammer Attacks and Privilege EscalationYuan Xiao, Xiaokuan Zhang, Yinqian Zhang, Radu TeodorescuUSENIX Security 2016 · 272 citations
Related papers
- Revisiting RowHammer: An Experimental Analysis of Modern DRAM Devices and Mitigation TechniquesJeremie S. Kim, Minesh Patel, Abdullah Giray Yaglikçi, Hasan Hassan et al.ISCA 2020 · 161 citations
- BlockHammer: Preventing RowHammer at Low Cost by Blacklisting Rapidly-Accessed DRAM RowsAbdullah Giray Yaglikçi, Minesh Patel, Jeremie S. Kim, Roknoddin Azizi et al.HPCA 2021 · 124 citations
- Understanding RowHammer Under Reduced Refresh Latency: Experimental Analysis of Real DRAM Chips and Implications on Future SolutionsYahya Can Tugrul, A. Giray Yaglikçi, Ismail Emir Yüksel, Ataberk Olgun et al.HPCA 2025 · 10 citations
- Quantifying Rowhammer Vulnerability for DRAM SecurityYichen Jiang, Huifeng Zhu, Dean Sullivan, Xiaolong Guo et al.DAC 2021 · 20 citations
- Spatial Variation-Aware Read Disturbance Defenses: Experimental Analysis of Real DRAM Chips and Implications on Future SolutionsAbdullah Giray Yaglikçi, Yahya Can Tugrul, Geraldo F. Oliveira, Ismail Emir Yüksel et al.HPCA 2024 · 22 citations
