What Planning Problems Can A Relational Neural Network Solve?
Jiayuan Mao, Tomás Lozano-Pérez, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Leslie Pack Kaelbling
Abstract
Goal-conditioned policies are generally understood to be "feed-forward" circuits, in the form of neural networks that map from the current state and the goal specification to the next action to take. However, under what circumstances such a policy can be learned and how efficient the policy will be are not well understood. In this paper, we present a circuit complexity analysis for relational neural networks (such as graph neural networks and transformers) representing policies for planning problems, by drawing connections with serialized goal regression search (S-GRS). We show that there are three general classes of planning problems, in terms of the growth of circuit width and depth as a function of the number of objects and planning horizon, providing constructive proofs. We also illustrate the utility of this analysis for designing neural networks for policy learning. * For simplicity, throughout the paper, we will be focusing on Boolean state variables.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 070465dc-9b10-4549-a1dd-fa7d2c86eda1Cited by top-tier papers2
- Can Graph Learning Improve Planning in LLM-based Agents?Xixi Wu, Yifei Shen, Caihua Shan, Kaitao Song et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 67 citations
- Graph Learning for Numeric PlanningDillon Z. Chen, Sylvie ThiébauxNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
Builds on6
- How Neural Networks Extrapolate: From Feedforward to Graph Neural NetworksKeyulu Xu, Mozhi Zhang, Jingling Li, Simon Shaolei Du et al.ICLR 2021 · 364 citations
- Grounding Large Language Models in Interactive Environments with Online Reinforcement LearningThomas Carta, Clément Romac, Thomas Wolf, Sylvain Lamprier et al.ICML 2023 · 258 citations
- SizeShiftReg: a Regularization Method for Improving Size-Generalization in Graph Neural NetworksDavide Buffelli, Pietro Lió, Fabio VandinNeurIPS 2022 · 50 citations
- Expressive Power of Invariant and Equivariant Graph Neural NetworksWaïss Azizian, Marc LelargeICLR 2021 · 22 citations
- The Logical Expressiveness of Graph Neural NetworksPablo Barceló, Egor V. Kostylev, Mikaël Monet, Jorge Pérez et al.ICLR 2020 · 17 citations
Related papers
- Learning More Expressive General Policies for Classical Planning DomainsSimon Ståhlberg, Blai Bonet, Hector GeffnerAAAI 2025
- Graph Neural Network Based Action Ranking for PlanningRajesh Mangannavar, Stefan Lee, Alan Fern, Prasad TadepalliNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Do Transformer World Models Give Better Policy Gradients?Michel Ma, Tianwei Ni, Clement Gehring, Pierluca D'Oro et al.ICML 2024 · 7 citations
- Understanding Transformer Reasoning Capabilities via Graph AlgorithmsClayton Sanford, Bahare Fatemi, Ethan Hall, Anton Tsitsulin et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 84 citations
- Symbolic Network: Generalized Neural Policies for Relational MDPsSankalp Garg, Aniket Bajpai, MausamICML 2020 · 39 citations
