Learning More Expressive General Policies for Classical Planning Domains
Simon Ståhlberg, Blai Bonet, Hector Geffner
Abstract
GNN-based approaches for learning general policies across planning domains are limited by the expressive power of C2, namely; first-order logic with two variables and counting. This limitation can be overcame by transitioning to k-GNNs, for k = 3, wherein object embeddings are substituted with triplet embeddings. Yet, while 3-GNNs have the expressive power of C3, unlike 1and 2-GNNs that are confined to C2, they require quartic time for message exchange and cubic space to store embeddings, rendering them infeasible in practice. In this work, we introduce a parameterized version R-GNN[t] (with parameter t) of Relational GNNs. Unlike GNNs, that are designed to perform computation on graphs, Relational GNNs are designed to do computation on relational structures. When t = ∞, R-GNN[t] approximates 3-GNNs over graphs, but using only quadratic space for embeddings. For lower values of t, such as t = 1 and t = 2, R-GNN[t] achieves a weaker approximation by exchanging fewer messages, yet interestingly, often yield the expressivity required in several planning domains. Furthermore, the new R-GNN[t] architecture is the original R-GNN architecture with a suitable transformation applied to the inputs only. Experimental results illustrate the clear performance gains of R-GNN[1] over the plain R-GNNs, and also over Edge Transformers that also approximate 3-GNNs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext db5874fb-a286-4216-8948-686cc136c408Cited by top-tier papers2
- Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated PlanningMarkus Fritzsche, Elliot Gestrin, Jendrik SeippAAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- Learning to Search and Searching to Learn for Generalization in PlanningMichael Aichmüller, Yannik Hesse, Hector GeffnerICML 2026
Builds on5
- Composition-based Multi-Relational Graph Convolutional NetworksShikhar Vashishth, Soumya Sanyal, Vikram Nitin, Partha P. TalukdarICLR 2020 · 1,105 citations
- Systematic Generalization with Edge TransformersLeon Bergen, Timothy J. O'Donnell, Dzmitry BahdanauNeurIPS 2021 · 62 citations
- Learning General Planning Policies from Small Examples Without SupervisionGuillem Francès, Blai Bonet, Hector GeffnerAAAI 2021 · 44 citations
- The Logical Expressiveness of Graph Neural NetworksPablo Barceló, Egor V. Kostylev, Mikaël Monet, Jorge Pérez et al.ICLR 2020 · 17 citations
- Towards Principled Graph TransformersLuis Müller, Daniel Kusuma, Blai Bonet, Christopher MorrisNeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
Related papers
- Calibrate and Boost Logical Expressiveness of GNN Over Multi-Relational and Temporal GraphsYeyuan Chen, Dingmin WangNeurIPS 2023 · 2 citations
- What Planning Problems Can A Relational Neural Network Solve?Jiayuan Mao, Tomás Lozano-Pérez, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Leslie Pack KaelblingNeurIPS 2023 · 13 citations
- Graph Neural Network Based Action Ranking for PlanningRajesh Mangannavar, Stefan Lee, Alan Fern, Prasad TadepalliNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Enhancing Logical Expressiveness in Graph Neural Networks via Path-Neighbor AggregationHan Yu, Xiaojuan Zhao, Aiping Li, Kai Chen et al.AAAI 2026
- The Logical Expressiveness of Temporal GNNs via Two-Dimensional Product LogicsMarco Sälzer, Przemyslaw Andrzej Walega, Martin LangeNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
