Dataset-Adaptive Dimensionality Reduction
Hyeon Jeon, Jeongin Park, Soohyun Lee, Dae Hyun Kim, Sungbok Shin, Jinwook Seo
Abstract
Selecting the appropriate dimensionality reduction (DR) technique and determining its optimal hyperparameter settings that maximize the accuracy of the output projections typically involves extensive trial and error, often resulting in unnecessary computational overhead. To address this challenge, we propose a dataset-adaptive approach to DR optimization guided by structural complexity metrics. These metrics quantify the intrinsic complexity of a dataset, predicting whether higher-dimensional spaces are necessary to represent it accurately. Since complex datasets are often inaccurately represented in two-dimensional projections, leveraging these metrics enables us to predict the maximum achievable accuracy of DR techniques for a given dataset, eliminating redundant trials in optimizing DR. We introduce the design and theoretical foundations of these structural complexity metrics. We quantitatively verify that our metrics effectively approximate the ground truth complexity of datasets and confirm their suitability for guiding dataset-adaptive DR workflow. Finally, we empirically show that our dataset-adaptive workflow significantly enhances the efficiency of DR optimization without compromising accuracy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 06e68181-ecad-4f41-acdd-9f3a22f16512Builds on8
- Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable InformationKawin Ethayarajh, Yejin Choi, Swabha SwayamdiptaICML 2022 · 337 citations
- Topological AutoencodersMichael Moor, Max Horn, Bastian Rieck, Karsten M. BorgwardtICML 2020 · 192 citations
- Revisiting Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Visual Cluster Analysis: An Empirical StudyJiazhi Xia, Yuchen Zhang, Jie Song, Yang Chen et al.IEEE VIS 2021 · 82 citations
- Interactive Visual Cluster Analysis by Contrastive Dimensionality ReductionJiazhi Xia, Linquan Huang, Weixing Lin, Xin Zhao et al.IEEE VIS 2022 · 38 citations
- Measuring and Explaining the Inter-Cluster Reliability of Multidimensional ProjectionsHyeon Jeon, Hyung-Kwon Ko, Jaemin Jo, Youngtaek Kim et al.IEEE VIS 2021 · 33 citations
Related papers
- Exploiting Explainable Metrics for Augmented SGDMahdi S. Hosseini, Mathieu Tuli, Konstantinos N. PlataniotisCVPR 2022 · 3 citations
- Predicting User Preferences of Dimensionality Reduction Embedding QualityCristina Morariu, Adrien Bibal, René Cutura, Benoît Frénay et al.IEEE VIS 2022 · 13 citations
- Model-agnostic Measure of Generalization DifficultyAkhilan Boopathy, Kevin Liu, Jaedong Hwang, Shu Ge et al.ICML 2023 · 8 citations
- Interpreting and Disentangling Feature Components of Various Complexity from DNNsJie Ren, Mingjie Li, Zexu Liu, Quanshi ZhangICML 2021 · 20 citations
- Towards Exploring the Limitations of Active Learning: An Empirical StudyQiang Hu, Yuejun Guo, Maxime Cordy, Xiaofei Xie et al.ASE 2021 · 18 citations
