DISCERN: Decoding Systematic Errors in Natural Language for Text Classifiers
Rakesh R. Menon, Shashank Srivastava
Abstract
Despite their high predictive accuracies, current machine learning systems often exhibit systematic biases stemming from annotation artifacts or insufficient support for certain classes in the dataset. Recent work proposes automatic methods for identifying and explaining systematic biases using keywords. We introduce DIS-CERN, a framework for interpreting systematic biases in text classifiers using language explanations. DISCERN iteratively generates precise natural language descriptions of systematic errors by employing an interactive loop between two large language models. Finally, we use the descriptions to improve classifiers by augmenting classifier training sets with synthetically generated instances or annotated examples via active learning. On three text-classification datasets, we demonstrate that language explanations from our framework induce consistent performance improvements that go beyond what is achievable with exemplars of systematic bias. Finally, in human evaluations, we show that users can interpret systematic biases more effectively (by over 25% relative) and efficiently when described through language explanations as opposed to cluster exemplars. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0682340d-7a83-46e4-9986-64845a4a705cCited by top-tier papers4
- TRoVe: Discovering Error-Inducing Static Feature Biases in Temporal Vision-Language ModelsMaya Varma, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Sophie Ostmeier, Akshay Chaudhari et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Learning from Reasoning Failures via Synthetic Data GenerationGabriela Ben Melech Stan, Estelle Aflalo, Avinash Madasu, Vasudev Lal et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Explaining Differences Between Model Pairs in Natural Language through Sample LearningAdvaith Malladi, Rakesh R. Menon, Yuvraj Jain, Shashank SrivastavaEMNLP 2025
- Symbal: Detecting Systematic Misalignments in Model-Generated CaptionsMaya Varma, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Sophie Ostmeier, Akshay Chaudhari et al.ICML 2026
Builds on18
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Distributionally Robust Neural NetworksShiori Sagawa, Pang Wei Koh, Tatsunori B. Hashimoto, Percy LiangICLR 2020 · 1,578 citations
- Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugXinyun Chen, Maxwell Lin, Nathanael Schärli, Denny ZhouICLR 2024 · 1,085 citations
Related papers
- DEXTER: Diffusion-Guided EXplanations with TExtual Reasoning for Vision ModelsSimone Carnemolla, Matteo Pennisi, Sarinda Samarasinghe, Giovanni Bellitto et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Label-Descriptive Patterns and Their Application to Characterizing Classification ErrorsMichael A. Hedderich, Jonas Fischer, Dietrich Klakow, Jilles VreekenICML 2022 · 14 citations
- FIND: Human-in-the-Loop Debugging Deep Text ClassifiersPiyawat Lertvittayakumjorn, Lucia Specia, Francesca ToniEMNLP 2020 · 33 citations
- Classifier-to-Bias: Toward Unsupervised Automatic Bias Detection for Visual ClassifiersQuentin Guimard, Moreno D'Incà, Massimiliano Mancini, Elisa RicciCVPR 2025
- Discovering and Mitigating Visual Biases Through Keyword ExplanationYounghyun Kim, Sangwoo Mo, Minkyu Kim, Kyungmin Lee et al.CVPR 2024
