Lune

EMNLP Findings2025

Explainable Text Classification with LLMs: Enhancing Performance through Dialectical Prompting and Explanation-Guided Training

Huaming Du, Lei Yuan, Cancan Feng, Guisong Liu, Gang Kou, Carl Yang

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved impressive success across a range of natural language processing tasks. However, they still underperform in text classification tasks compared to fine-tuned small models. This can be linked to complexities in addressing contextdependent expressions and complex linguistic phenomena. In contrast, fine-tuned small models typically achieve high prediction accuracy but often lack explanations for predictions. Existing explanation methods that generate keywords may be less effective due to missing critical contextual information. To mitigate these challenges, we propose a novel method termed Dialectical Explanation Training (DET). This method introduces a new prompting strategy, Dialectical Prompting, and integrates it with Explanation-Guided Training. Dialectical Prompting uses LLMs with our designed dialectical prompt to generate explanations for possible labels. These explanations handle contextdependent expressions and complex linguistic phenomena by considering multiple perspectives and providing rich, contextually relevant information. Explanation-Guided Training employs these explanations as features for training a small model, which combines the advantages of dialectical explanations and the predictive power of fine-tuned models to improve overall accuracy and interpretability. In addition, we incorporate the theory of Evidential Deep Learning, which further enhances the model's classification performance and quantify the uncertainty of its predictions. Extensive experiments on multiple datasets from diverse domains have demonstrated that our proposed model significantly improves accuracy and explanation quality over state-of the-art methods in text classification.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on17

  1. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
  2. Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
  3. Deep Evidential RegressionAlexander Amini, Wilko Schwarting, Ava Soleimany, Daniela RusNeurIPS 2020 · 777 citations
  4. Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model SizesCheng-Yu Hsieh, Chun-Liang Li, Chih-Kuan Yeh, Hootan Nakhost et al.ACL Findings 2023 · 317 citations
  5. BertGCN: Transductive Text Classification by Combining GNN and BERTYuxiao Lin, Yuxian Meng, Xiaofei Sun, Qinghong Han et al.ACL Findings 2021 · 229 citations

Related papers

  1. Visual Evidence Prompting Mitigates Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language ModelsWei Li, Zhen Huang, Houqiang Li, Le Lu et al.ACL 2025
  2. Text Classification via Large Language ModelsXiaofei Sun, Xiaoya Li, Jiwei Li, Fei Wu et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 218 citations
  3. Improving Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition with Natural Language Explanations from LLMsHeng Wang, Changxing WuAAAI 2026
  4. The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-shot Prompting for Textual ReasoningXi Ye, Greg DurrettNeurIPS 2022 · 272 citations
  5. One More Question is Enough, Expert Question Decomposition (EQD) Model for Domain Quantitative ReasoningMengyu Wang, Sotirios Sabanis, Miguel de Carvalho, Shay B. Cohen et al.EMNLP Findings 2025
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines