Linear Representations of Political Perspective Emerge in Large Language Models
Junsol Kim, James Evans, Aaron Schein
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to generate text that realistically reflects a range of different subjective human perspectives. This paper studies how LLMs are seemingly able to reflect more liberal versus more conservative viewpoints among other political perspectives in American politics. We show that LLMs possess linear representations of political perspectives within activation space, wherein more similar perspectives are represented closer together. To do so, we probe the attention heads across the layers of three open transformerbased LLMs (Llama-2-7b-chat, Mistral-7b-instruct, Vicuna-7b). We first prompt models to generate text from the perspectives of different U.S. lawmakers. We then identify sets of attention heads whose activations linearly predict those lawmakers' DW-NOMINATE scores, a widely-used and validated measure of political ideology. We find that highly predictive heads are primarily located in the middle layers, often speculated to encode high-level concepts and tasks. Using probes only trained to predict lawmakers' ideology, we then show that the same probes can predict measures of news outlets' slant from the activations of models prompted to simulate text from those news outlets. These linear probes allow us to visualize, interpret, and monitor ideological stances implicitly adopted by an LLM as it generates open-ended responses. Finally, we demonstrate that by applying linear interventions to these attention heads, we can steer the model outputs toward a more liberal or conservative stance. Overall, our research suggests that LLMs possess a high-level linear representation of American political ideology and that by leveraging recent advances in mechanistic interpretability, we can identify, monitor, and steer the subjective perspective underlying generated text. PRELIMINARIES In this section, we define notation and provide relevant background on the architecture of transformerbased LLMs and probing methodology for discovering representations of concepts in LLMs. (5) 1 This representation is a simplification that elides details about layer normalization among other steps that are not important for the present study. However, we note that x ℓ,h will be taken before any layer normalization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 066466db-e88f-4965-a168-6f9b29db1d7fCited by top-tier papers15
- Valid Survey Simulations with Limited Human Data: The Roles of Prompting, Fine-Tuning, and RectificationStefan Krsteski, Giuseppe Russo, Serina Chang, Robert West et al.ACL 2026 · 10 citations
- Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning Enhances Activation Intensity and Diversity in the Internal Circuitry of LLMsHonglin Zhang, Qianyue Hao, Fengli Xu, Yong LiICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Deep Value Benchmark: Measuring Whether Models Generalize Deep Values or Shallow PreferencesJoshua Ashkinaze, Hua Shen, Sai Avula, Eric Gilbert et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- DISCO: Disentangled Communication Steering for Large Language ModelsMax Torop, Aria Masoomi, Masih Eskandar, Jennifer G. DyNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- PoliCon: Evaluating LLMs on Achieving Diverse Political Consensus ObjectivesZhaowei Zhang, Xiaobo Wang, Minghua Yi, Mengmeng Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on14
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,549 citations
- Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single DirectionAndy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed, Daniel Paleka et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,166 citations
- Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee et al.ICML 2023 · 764 citations
- Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language ModelsMrinank Sharma, Meg Tong, Tomasz Korbak, David Duvenaud et al.ICLR 2024 · 762 citations
Related papers
- Hidden Persuaders: LLMs' Political Leaning and Their Influence on VotersYujin Potter, Shiyang Lai, Junsol Kim, James Evans et al.EMNLP 2024 · 14 citations
- Reading Between the Tokens: Improving Preference Predictions through Mechanistic ForecastingSarah Ball, Simeon Allmendinger, Frauke Kreuter, Niklas KühlICML 2026
- SAE-SSV: Supervised Steering in Sparse Representation Spaces for Reliable Control of Language ModelsZirui He, Mingyu Jin, Bo Shen, Ali Payani et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Examining Alignment of Large Language Models through Representative Heuristics: the case of political stereotypesSullam Jeoung, Yubin Ge, Haohan Wang, Jana DiesnerICLR 2025
- Inertia in Moral and Value Judgments of Large Language ModelsBruce W. Lee, Yeongheon Lee, Hyunsoo ChoACL 2026 · 5 citations
