USENIX Security2023Top-tier venue
Inductive Graph Unlearning
Cheng-Long Wang, Mengdi Huai, Di Wang
Abstract
As a way to implement the"right to be forgotten"in machine learning, machine unlearning aims to completely remove the contributions and information of the samples to be deleted from a trained model without affecting the contributions of other samples. Recently, many frameworks for machine unlearning have been proposed, and most of them focus on image and text data. To extend machine unlearning to graph data, GraphEraser has been proposed. However, a critical issue is that GraphEraser is specifically designed for the transductive graph setting, where the graph is static and attributes and edges of test nodes are visible during training. It is unsuitable for the inductive setting, where the graph could be dynamic and the test graph information is invisible in advance. Such inductive capability is essential for production machine learning systems with evolving graphs like social media and transaction networks. To fill this gap, we propose the G****Uided InDuctivE Graph Unlearning framework (GUIDE). GUIDE consists of three components: guided graph partitioning with fairness and balance, efficient subgraph repair, and similarity-based aggregation. Empirically, we evaluate our method on several inductive benchmarks and evolving transaction graphs. Generally speaking, GUIDE can be efficiently implemented on the inductive graph learning tasks for its low graph partition cost, no matter on computation or structure information. The code will be available here: https://github.com/Happy2Git/GUIDE.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0599fb6e-cf5d-4a7d-9821-2fa39f15b941Cited by top-tier papers20
- Towards Understanding and Enhancing Robustness of Deep Learning Models against Malicious Unlearning AttacksWei Qian, Chenxu Zhao, Wei Le, Meiyi Ma et al.KDD 2023 · 38 citations
- Certified Minimax Unlearning with Generalization Rates and Deletion CapacityJiaqi Liu, Jian Lou, Zhan Qin, Kui RenNeurIPS 2023 · 38 citations
- Towards Effective and General Graph Unlearning via Mutual EvolutionXunkai Li, Yulin Zhao, Zhengyu Wu, Wentao Zhang et al.AAAI 2024 · 38 citations
- Communication Efficient and Provable Federated UnlearningYouming Tao, Cheng-Long Wang, Miao Pan, Dongxiao Yu et al.VLDB 2024 · 35 citations
- Static and Sequential Malicious Attacks in the Context of Selective ForgettingChenxu Zhao, Wei Qian, Rex Ying, Mengdi HuaiNeurIPS 2023 · 30 citations
Builds on21
- How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?Shaked Brody, Uri Alon, Eran YahavICLR 2022 · 1,717 citations
- Machine UnlearningLucas Bourtoule, Varun Chandrasekaran, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Hengrui Jia et al.S&P 2021 · 1,381 citations
- Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural NetworkDongsheng Luo, Wei Cheng, Dongkuan Xu, Wenchao Yu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 888 citations
- Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning ModelsChuan Guo, Tom Goldstein, Awni Y. Hannun, Laurens van der MaatenICML 2020 · 633 citations
- Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine UnlearningAyush Sekhari, Jayadev Acharya, Gautam Kamath, Ananda Theertha SureshNeurIPS 2021 · 516 citations
Related papers
- Graph UnlearningMin Chen, Zhikun Zhang, Tianhao Wang, Michael Backes et al.CCS 2022 · 103 citations
- Community-Centric Graph UnlearningYi Li, Shichao Zhang, Guixian Zhang, Debo ChengAAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- PAGE: A Unified Approach for Federated Graph UnlearningYuming Ai, Xunkai Li, Jiaqi Chao, Bowen Fan et al.AAAI 2026
- Efficient Model Updates for Approximate Unlearning of Graph-Structured DataEli Chien, Chao Pan, Olgica MilenkovicICLR 2023
- Machine Unlearning in Gradient Boosting Decision TreesHuawei Lin, Jun Woo Chung, Yingjie Lao, Weijie ZhaoKDD 2023 · 13 citations
