Redundancy Undermines the Trustworthiness of Self-Interpretable GNNs
Wenxin Tai, Ting Zhong, Goce Trajcevski, Fan Zhou
Abstract
This work presents a systematic investigation into the trustworthiness of explanations generated by self-interpretable graph neural networks (GNNs), revealing why models trained with different random seeds yield inconsistent explanations. We identify redundancy-resulting from weak conciseness constraints-as the root cause of both explanation inconsistency and its associated inaccuracy, ultimately hindering user trust and limiting GNN deployment in high-stakes applications. Our analysis demonstrates that redundancy is difficult to eliminate; however, a simple ensemble strategy can mitigate its detrimental effects. We validate our findings through extensive experiments across diverse datasets, model architectures, and self-interpretable GNN frameworks, providing a benchmark to guide future research on addressing redundancy and advancing GNN deployment in critical domains. Our code is available at https://github.com/ICDM-UESTC/ TrustworthyExplanation .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 053f2fc9-e927-4719-83f8-44e59655a213Cited by top-tier papers4
- GNN Explanations that do not Explain and How to find ThemSteve Azzolin, Stefano Teso, Bruno Lepri, Andrea Passerini et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Modality-Balanced Collaborative Distillation for Multi-Modal Domain GeneralizationXiaohan Wang, Zhangtao Cheng, Ting Zhong, Leiting Chen et al.AAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves the Trustworthiness of Self-Interpretable GNNsWenxin Tai, Ting Zhong, Goce Trajcevski, Fan ZhouICLR 2026
- Cello: A Universal Cell-wise Feature Aggregation framework for Reliable Pathology Images AnalysisHengrui Lou, Weihan Li, Jiazhen Yang, Lingxiang Jia et al.ICML 2026
Builds on18
- Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural NetworkDongsheng Luo, Wei Cheng, Dongkuan Xu, Wenchao Yu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 888 citations
- On Explainability of Graph Neural Networks via Subgraph ExplorationsHao Yuan, Haiyang Yu, Jie Wang, Kang Li et al.ICML 2021 · 498 citations
- Discovering Invariant Rationales for Graph Neural NetworksYingxin Wu, Xiang Wang, An Zhang, Xiangnan He et al.ICLR 2022 · 313 citations
- Interpretable and Generalizable Graph Learning via Stochastic Attention MechanismSiqi Miao, Mia Liu, Pan LiICML 2022 · 288 citations
- Graph Information Bottleneck for Subgraph RecognitionJunchi Yu, Tingyang Xu, Yu Rong, Yatao Bian et al.ICLR 2021 · 200 citations
Related papers
- Is Your Explanation Reliable: Confidence-Aware Explanation on Graph Neural NetworksJiaxing Zhang, Xiaoou Liu, Dongsheng Luo, Hua WeiKDD 2025 · 1 citation
- Graph Segmentation and Contrastive Enhanced Explainer for Graph Neural NetworksZhiqiang Wang, Jiayu Guo, Jianqing Liang, Jiye Liang et al.AAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- Reconsidering Faithfulness in Regular, Self-Explainable and Domain Invariant GNNsSteve Azzolin, Antonio Longa, Stefano Teso, Andrea PasseriniICLR 2025
- Self-Interpretable Graph Learning with Sufficient and Necessary ExplanationsJiale Deng, Yanyan ShenAAAI 2024 · 16 citations
- Multi-scale Explainer for Graph Neural NetworksLutong Wu, Shiying Cheng, Zhiqiang Wang, Jianqing Liang et al.ICML 2026
