3D Assembly Completion
Weihao Wang, Rufeng Zhang, Mingyu You, Hongjun Zhou, Bin He
Abstract
Automatic assembly is a promising research topic in 3D computer vision and robotics. Existing works focus on generating assembly (e.g., IKEA furniture) from scratch with a set of parts, namely 3D part assembly. In practice, there are higher demands for the robot to take over and finish an incomplete assembly (e.g., a half-assembled IKEA furniture) with an off-the-shelf toolkit, especially in human-robot and multi-agent collaborations. Compared to 3D part assembly, it is more complicated in nature and remains unexplored yet. The robot must understand the incomplete structure, infer what parts are missing, single out the correct parts from the toolkit and finally, assemble them with appropriate poses to finish the incomplete assembly. Geometrically similar parts in the toolkit can interfere, and this problem will be exacerbated with more missing parts. To tackle this issue, we propose a novel task called 3D assembly completion. Given an incomplete assembly, it aims to find its missing parts from a toolkit and predict the 6-DoF poses to make the assembly complete. To this end, we propose FiT, a framework for Finishing the incomplete 3D assembly with Transformer. We employ the encoder to model the incomplete assembly into memories. Candidate parts interact with memories in a memory-query paradigm for final candidate classification and pose prediction. Bipartite part matching and symmetric transformation consistency are embedded to refine the completion. For reasonable evaluation and further reference, we design two standard toolkits of different difficulty, containing different compositions of candidate parts. We conduct extensive comparisons with several baseline methods and ablation studies, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 04f3469c-b5ba-46c6-bc8e-daa25088dd8cCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 7,049 citations
- Point-BERT: Pre-training 3D Point Cloud Transformers with Masked Point ModelingXumin Yu, Lulu Tang, Yongming Rao, Tiejun Huang et al.CVPR 2022 · 684 citations
- PoinTr: Diverse Point Cloud Completion with Geometry-Aware TransformersXumin Yu, Yongming Rao, Ziyi Wang, Zuyan Liu et al.ICCV 2021 · 592 citations
- ShapeFormer: Transformer-based Shape Completion via Sparse RepresentationXingguang Yan, Liqiang Lin, Niloy J. Mitra, Dani Lischinski et al.CVPR 2022 · 124 citations
- Generative 3D Part Assembly via Dynamic Graph LearningGuanqi Zhan, Qingnan Fan, Kaichun Mo, Lin Shao et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 113 citations
Related papers
- Imagine: Image-Guided 3D Part Assembly with Structure Knowledge GraphWeihao Wang, Yu Lan, Mingyu You, Bin HeAAAI 2025
- Manual-PA: Learning 3D Part Assembly from Instruction DiagramsJiahao Zhang, Anoop Cherian, Cristian Rodriguez, Weijian Deng et al.ICCV 2025 · 2 citations
- CRAG: Can 3D Generative Models Help 3D Assembly?Zeyu Jiang, Sihang Li, Siqi Tan, Chenyang Xu et al.ICML 2026
- Leveraging SE(3) Equivariance for Learning 3D Geometric Shape AssemblyRuihai Wu, Chenrui Tie, Yushi Du, Yan Zhao et al.ICCV 2023 · 34 citations
- ATISS: Autoregressive Transformers for Indoor Scene SynthesisDespoina Paschalidou, Amlan Kar, Maria Shugrina, Karsten Kreis et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 293 citations
