Privacy Assessment on Reconstructed Images: Are Existing Evaluation Metrics Faithful to Human Perception?
Xiaoxiao Sun, Nidham Gazagnadou, Vivek Sharma, Lingjuan Lyu, Hongdong Li, Liang Zheng
Abstract
Hand-crafted image quality metrics, such as PSNR and SSIM, are commonly used to evaluate model privacy risk under reconstruction attacks. Under these metrics, reconstructed images that are determined to resemble the original one generally indicate more privacy leakage. Images determined as overall dissimilar, on the other hand, indicate higher robustness against attack. However, there is no guarantee that these metrics well reflect human opinions, which offers trustworthy judgement for model privacy leakage. In this paper, we comprehensively study the faithfulness of these hand-crafted metrics to human perception of privacy information from the reconstructed images. On 5 datasets ranging from natural images, faces, to fine-grained classes, we use 4 existing attack methods to reconstruct images from many different classification models and, for each reconstructed image, we ask multiple human annotators to assess whether this image is recognizable. Our studies reveal that the hand-crafted metrics only have a weak correlation with the human evaluation of privacy leakage and that even these metrics themselves often contradict each other. These observations suggest risks of current metrics in the community. To address this potential risk, we propose a learning-based measure called SemSim to evaluate the Semantic Similarity between the original and reconstructed images. SemSim is trained with a standard triplet loss, using an original image as an anchor, one of its recognizable reconstructed images as a positive sample, and an unrecognizable one as a negative. By training on human annotations, SemSim exhibits a greater reflection of privacy leakage on the semantic level. We show that SemSim has a significantly higher correlation with human judgment compared with existing metrics. Moreover, this strong correlation generalizes to unseen datasets, models and attack methods. We envision this work as a milestone for image quality evaluation closer to the human level. The project webpage can be accessed at https://sites.google.com/view/semsim .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 04d1a201-ceb3-471c-84bd-e997f5231295Cited by top-tier papers4
- PerceptAnon: Exploring the Human Perception of Image Anonymization Beyond Pseudonymization for GDPRKartik Patwari, Chen-Nee Chuah, Lingjuan Lyu, Vivek SharmaICML 2024 · 3 citations
- S2NeRF: Privacy-preserving Training Framework for NeRFBokang Zhang, Yanglin Zhang, Zhikun Zhang, Jinglan Yang et al.CCS 2024
- Hyperbolic-Enhanced Mixture-of-Experts Mamba for Sequential RecommendationYuwen Liu, Lianyong Qi, Xingyuan Mao, Weiming Liu et al.AAAI 2026
- InfoDecom: Decomposing Information for Defending Against Privacy Leakage in Split InferenceRuijun Deng, Zhihui Lu, Qiang DuanAAAI 2026
Builds on7
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated LearningYangsibo Huang, Samyak Gupta, Zhao Song, Kai Li et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 419 citations
- R-GAP: Recursive Gradient Attack on PrivacyJunyi Zhu, Matthew B. BlaschkoICLR 2021 · 157 citations
- Adversarial Learning of Privacy-Preserving and Task-Oriented RepresentationsTaihong Xiao, Yi-Hsuan Tsai, Kihyuk Sohn, Manmohan Chandraker et al.AAAI 2020 · 87 citations
Related papers
- DreamSim: Learning New Dimensions of Human Visual Similarity using Synthetic DataStephanie Fu, Netanel Tamir, Shobhita Sundaram, Lucy Chai et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 413 citations
- The Inadequacy of Similarity-Based Privacy Metrics: Privacy Attacks Against "Truly Anonymous" Synthetic DatasetsGeorgi Ganev, Emiliano De CristofaroS&P 2025
- Adversarial Example Quality Assessment: A Large-scale Dataset and Strong BaselineJia-Li Yin, Menghao Chen, Jin Han, Bo-Hao Chen et al.ACM MM 2024 · 1 citation
- A Sample-Level Evaluation and Generative Framework for Model Inversion AttacksHaoyang Li, Li Bai, Qingqing Ye, Haibo Hu et al.AAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- Gradient Obfuscation Gives a False Sense of Security in Federated LearningKai Yue, Richeng Jin, Chau-Wai Wong, Dror Baron et al.USENIX Security 2023
