CoT Information: Improved Sample Complexity under Chain-of-Thought Supervision
Awni Altabaa, Omar Montasser, John D. Lafferty
Abstract
Learning complex functions that involve multi-step reasoning poses a significant challenge for standard supervised learning from input-output examples. Chain-of-thought (CoT) supervision, which provides intermediate reasoning steps together with the final output, has emerged as a powerful empirical technique, underpinning much of the recent progress in the reasoning capabilities of large language models. This paper develops a statistical theory of learning under CoT supervision. A key characteristic of the CoT setting, in contrast to standard supervision, is the mismatch between the training objective (CoT risk) and the test objective (end-to-end risk). A central part of our analysis, distinguished from prior work, is explicitly linking those two types of risk to achieve sharper sample complexity bounds. This is achieved via the CoT information measure , which quantifies the additional discriminative power gained from observing the reasoning process. The main theoretical results demonstrate how CoT supervision can yield significantly faster learning rates compared to standard E2E supervision. Specifically, it is shown that the sample complexity required to achieve a target E2E error scales as , where is a measure of hypothesis class complexity, which can be much faster than standard rates. Information-theoretic lower bounds in terms of the CoT information are also obtained. Together, these results suggest that CoT information is a fundamental measure of statistical complexity for learning under chain-of-thought supervision.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0422f452-82d6-4eea-aefb-abe82de60ea4Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical PerspectiveGuhao Feng, Bohang Zhang, Yuntian Gu, Haotian Ye et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 470 citations
- Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial ProblemsZhiyuan Liu, Hong Liu, Denny Zhou, Tengyu MaICLR 2024 · 259 citations
Related papers
- Compositional Generalization from Learned Skills via CoT Training: A Theoretical and Structural Analysis for ReasoningXinhao Yao, Ruifeng Ren, Yun Liao, Lizhong Ding et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Understanding Chain-of-Thought in LLMs through Information TheoryJean-Francois Ton, Muhammad Faaiz Taufiq, Yang LiuICML 2025
- Training Nonlinear Transformers for Chain-of-Thought Inference: A Theoretical Generalization AnalysisHongkang Li, Songtao Lu, Pin-Yu Chen, Xiaodong Cui et al.ICLR 2025
- From Sparse Dependence to Sparse Attention: Unveiling How Chain-of-Thought Enhances Transformer Sample EfficiencyKaiyue Wen, Huaqing Zhang, Hongzhou Lin, Jingzhao ZhangICLR 2025
- When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMsYuyang Wu, Yifei Wang, Ziyu Ye, Tianqi Du et al.ICLR 2026 · 225 citations
