From Sparse Dependence to Sparse Attention: Unveiling How Chain-of-Thought Enhances Transformer Sample Efficiency
Kaiyue Wen, Huaqing Zhang, Hongzhou Lin, Jingzhao Zhang
Abstract
Chain-of-thought (CoT) significantly enhances the reasoning performance of large language models (LLM). While current theoretical studies often attribute this improvement to increased expressiveness and computational capacity, we argue that expressiveness is not the primary limitation in the LLM regime, as current large models will fail on simple tasks. Using a parity-learning setup, we demonstrate that CoT can substantially improve sample efficiency even when the representation power is sufficient. Specifically, with CoT, a transformer can learn the function within polynomial samples, whereas without CoT, the required sample size is exponential. Additionally, we show that CoT simplifies the learning process by introducing sparse sequential dependencies among input tokens, and leads to a sparse and interpretable attention. We validate our theoretical analysis with both synthetic and real-world experiments, confirming that sparsity in attention layers is a key factor of the improvement induced by CoT. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 51240ae3-6dc6-48eb-99e8-0e0786cd7006Cited by top-tier papers20
- Transformers Provably Learn Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with Length GeneralizationYu Huang, Zixin Wen, Aarti Singh, Yuejie Chi et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
- Emergence of Superposition: Unveiling the Training Dynamics of Chain of Continuous ThoughtHanlin Zhu, Shibo Hao, Zhiting Hu, Jiantao Jiao et al.ICLR 2026 · 21 citations
- Let Me Think! A Long Chain of Thought Can Be Worth Exponentially Many Short OnesParsa Mirtaheri, Ezra Edelman, Samy Jelassi, Eran Malach et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Generalization or Hallucination? Understanding Out-of-Context Reasoning in TransformersYixiao Huang, Hanlin Zhu, Tianyu Guo, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Multi-head Transformers Provably Learn Symbolic Multi-step Reasoning via Gradient DescentTong Yang, Yu Huang, Yingbin Liang, Yuejie ChiNeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
Builds on39
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
Related papers
- Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial ProblemsZhiyuan Liu, Hong Liu, Denny Zhou, Tengyu MaICLR 2024 · 259 citations
- Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical PerspectiveGuhao Feng, Bohang Zhang, Yuntian Gu, Haotian Ye et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 470 citations
- A State-Transition Framework for Efficient LLM ReasoningLiang Zhang, Yu Zhao, Longyue Wang, Tianqi Shi et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- To CoT or not to CoT? Chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoningZayne Rea Sprague, Fangcong Yin, Juan Diego Rodriguez, Dongwei Jiang et al.ICLR 2025
- Do Efficient Transformers Really Save Computation?Kai Yang, Jan Ackermann, Zhenyu He, Guhao Feng et al.ICML 2024 · 29 citations
