AraEval: An Arabic Multi-Task Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models
Alhanoof Althnian, Norah A. Alzahrani, Shaykhah Z. Alsubaie, Eman Albilali, Ahmed Abdelali, Nouf M. Alotaibi, M. Saiful Bari, Yazeed Alnumay, Abdulhamed Alothaimen, Maryam Saif, Shahad D. Alzaidi, Faisal Abdulrahman Mirza
Abstract
The rapid advancements of Large Language models (LLMs) necessitate robust benchmarks. In this paper, we present AraEval, a pioneering and comprehensive evaluation suite specifically developed to assess the advanced knowledge, reasoning, truthfulness, and instructionfollowing capabilities of foundation models in the Arabic context. AraEval includes a diverse set of evaluation tasks that test various dimensions of knowledge and reasoning, with a total of 24,378 samples. These tasks cover areas such as linguistic understanding, factual recall, logical inference, commonsense reasoning, mathematical problem-solving, and domain-specific expertise, ensuring that the evaluation goes beyond basic language comprehension. It covers multiple domains of knowledge, such as science, history, religion, and literature, ensuring that the LLMs are tested on a broad spectrum of topics relevant to Arabic-speaking contexts. AraEval is designed to facilitate comparisons across different foundation models, enabling LLM developers and users to benchmark performance effectively. In addition, it provides diagnostic insights to identify specific areas where models excel or struggle, guiding further development. AraEval datasets can be found at https://huggingface.co/collections/humain-ai/ araeval-datasets-687760e04b12a7afb429a4a0 . Revealing the sensitivity of large language model leaderboards. In
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on11
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- FLASK: Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill SetsSeonghyeon Ye, Doyoung Kim, Sungdong Kim, Hyeonbin Hwang et al.ICLR 2024 · 176 citations
- The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP WorldPratik Joshi, Sebastin Santy, Amar Budhiraja, Kalika Bali et al.ACL 2020 · 40 citations
Related papers
- F-Eval: Asssessing Fundamental Abilities with Refined Evaluation MethodsYu Sun, Keyuchen Keyuchen, Shujie Wang, Peiji Li et al.ACL 2024
- Autonomous Evaluation of LLMs for Truth Maintenance and Reasoning TasksRushang Karia, Daniel Bramblett, Daksh Dobhal, Siddharth SrivastavaICLR 2025
- P-MMEval: A Parallel Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Consistent Evaluation of LLMsYidan Zhang, Yu Wan, Boyi Deng, Baosong Yang et al.EMNLP 2025
- DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning TasksKaijie Zhu, Jiaao Chen, Jindong Wang, Neil Zhenqiang Gong et al.ICLR 2024 · 92 citations
- DOMAINEVAL: An Auto-Constructed Benchmark for Multi-Domain Code GenerationQiming Zhu, Jialun Cao, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin et al.AAAI 2025 · 25 citations
