Two-sided fairness in rankings via Lorenz dominance
Virginie Do, Sam Corbett-Davies, Jamal Atif, Nicolas Usunier
Abstract
We consider the problem of generating rankings that are fair towards both users and item producers in recommender systems. We address both usual recommendation (e.g., of music or movies) and reciprocal recommendation (e.g., dating). Following concepts of distributive justice in welfare economics, our notion of fairness aims at increasing the utility of the worse-off individuals, which we formalize using the criterion of Lorenz efficiency. It guarantees that rankings are Pareto efficient, and that they maximally redistribute utility from better-off to worse-off, at a given level of overall utility. We propose to generate rankings by maximizing concave welfare functions, and develop an efficient inference procedure based on the Frank-Wolfe algorithm. We prove that unlike existing approaches based on fairness constraints, our approach always produces fair rankings. Our experiments also show that it increases the utility of the worse-off at lower costs in terms of overall utility.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 036b8a37-3a29-4f00-9b0a-ac7c195aa029Cited by top-tier papers17
- CPFair: Personalized Consumer and Producer Fairness Re-ranking for Recommender SystemsMohammadmehdi Naghiaei, Hossein A. Rahmani, Yashar DeldjooSIGIR 2022 · 117 citations
- Ensuring User-side Fairness in Dynamic Recommender SystemsHyunsik Yoo, Zhichen Zeng, Jian Kang, Ruizhong Qiu et al.WWW 2024 · 48 citations
- P-MMF: Provider Max-min Fairness Re-ranking in Recommender SystemChen Xu, Sirui Chen, Jun Xu, Weiran Shen et al.WWW 2023 · 41 citations
- Intersectional Two-sided Fairness in RecommendationYifan Wang, Peijie Sun, Weizhi Ma, Min Zhang et al.WWW 2024 · 27 citations
- Fair Ranking as Fair Division: Impact-Based Individual Fairness in RankingYuta Saito, Thorsten JoachimsKDD 2022 · 23 citations
Builds on7
- FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided PlatformsGourab K. Patro, Arpita Biswas, Niloy Ganguly, Krishna P. Gummadi et al.WWW 2020 · 268 citations
- Controlling Fairness and Bias in Dynamic Learning-to-RankMarco Morik, Ashudeep Singh, Jessica Hong, Thorsten JoachimsSIGIR 2020 · 205 citations
- TFROM: A Two-sided Fairness-Aware Recommendation Model for Both Customers and ProvidersYao Wu, Jian Cao, Guandong Xu, Yudong TanSIGIR 2021 · 84 citations
- Learning Fair Policies in Decentralized Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningMatthieu Zimmer, Claire Glanois, Umer Siddique, Paul WengICML 2021 · 76 citations
- Balancing the Tradeoff between Profit and Fairness in Rideshare Platforms during High-Demand HoursVedant Nanda, Pan Xu, Karthik Abinav Sankararaman, John P. Dickerson et al.AAAI 2020 · 73 citations
Related papers
- Optimizing Generalized Gini Indices for Fairness in RankingsVirginie Do, Nicolas UsunierSIGIR 2022 · 19 citations
- Contextual bandits with concave rewards, and an application to fair rankingVirginie Do, Elvis Dohmatob, Matteo Pirotta, Alessandro Lazaric et al.ICLR 2023
- Optimizing Rankings for Recommendation in Matching MarketsYi Su, Magd Bayoumi, Thorsten JoachimsWWW 2022 · 33 citations
- Fairness of Exposure in Stochastic BanditsLequn Wang, Yiwei Bai, Wen Sun, Thorsten JoachimsICML 2021 · 60 citations
- User-item fairness tradeoffs in recommendationsSophie Greenwood, Sudalakshmee Chiniah, Nikhil GargNeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
