Strategist: Self-improvement of LLM Decision Making via Bi-Level Tree Search
Jonathan Light, Min Cai, Weiqin Chen, Guanzhi Wang, Xiusi Chen, Wei Cheng, Yisong Yue, Ziniu Hu
Abstract
Traditional reinforcement learning and planning typically requires vast amounts of data and training to develop effective policies. In contrast, large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong generalization and zero-shot capabilities, but struggle with tasks that require detailed planning and decision-making in complex action spaces. We introduce STRATEGIST, a novel approach that integrates the strengths of both methods. Our approach leverages LLMs to search and update high-level strategies (as text), which are then refined and executed by low-level Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). STRATEGIST is a generalizable framework to optimize the strategy through population-based self-play simulations without the need for any training data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of STRATEGIST in learning optimal strategies for competitive, multi-turn games with partial information, including Game of Pure Strategy (GOPS) and multi-agent, hidden-identity discussion games like The Resistance: Avalon. Our results show that agents equipped with STRATE-GIST outperform those trained with traditional RL methods, other LLM-based skill acquisition techniques, pre-existing LLM agents across both game environments and achieves comparable performance against human players.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 02b877b3-9906-43d1-bb84-cdd3a521dfe0Cited by top-tier papers4
- Scaling Inference-Time Computation via Opponent Simulation: Enabling Online Strategic Adaptation in Repeated NegotiationXiangyu Liu, Di Wang, Zhe Feng, Aranyak MehtaICML 2026 · 2 citations
- The Stackelberg Speaker: Optimizing Persuasive Communication in Social Deduction GamesZheng Zhang, Deheng Ye, Peilin Zhao, Hao WangACL 2026
- Escaping Whack-a-Mole: Optimizing Documentation as Repo-Specific Playbooks for Coding AgentsYutong Cheng, Haifeng Chen, Wenchao Yu, Xujiang Zhao et al.ICML 2026
- Cardiverse: Harnessing LLMs for Novel Card Game PrototypingDanrui Li, Sen Zhang, Samuel S. Sohn, Kaidong Hu et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
Related papers
- Strat-Reasoner: Reinforcing Strategic Reasoning of LLMs in Multi-Agent GamesYidong He, Yutao Lai, Pengxu Yang, Jiarui Gan et al.ICML 2026
- Strategic Planning: A Top-Down Approach to Option GenerationMax Ruiz Luyten, Antonin Berthon, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2025
- Language Agents with Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Play in the Werewolf GameZelai Xu, Chao Yu, Fei Fang, Yu Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 145 citations
- Code World Models for General Game PlayingWolfgang Lehrach, Daniel Hennes, Miguel Lazaro-Gredilla, Xinghua Lou et al.ICLR 2026 · 27 citations
- MARSHAL: Incentivizing Multi-Agent Reasoning via Self-Play with Strategic LLMsHuining Yuan, Zelai Xu, Zheyue Tan, Xiangmin Yi et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
