Train for Truth, Keep the Skills: Binary Retrieval-Augmented Reward Mitigates Hallucinations
Tong Chen, Akari Asai, Luke Zettlemoyer, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Faeze Brahman
Abstract
Language models often generate factually incorrect information unsupported by their training data, a phenomenon known as extrinsic hallucination. Existing mitigation approaches often degrade performance on open-ended generation and downstream tasks, limiting their practical utility. We propose an online reinforcement learning method using a novel binary retrieval-augmented reward (RAR) to address this tradeoff. Unlike continuous reward schemes, our approach assigns a reward of one only when the model's output is entirely factually correct, and zero otherwise. We evaluate our method on Qwen3 reasoning models across diverse tasks. For open-ended generation, binary RAR achieves a 39.3% reduction in hallucination rates, substantially outperforming both supervised training and continuous-reward RL baselines. In short-form question answering, the model learns calibrated abstention, strategically outputting "I don't know" when faced with insufficient parametric knowledge. This yields 44.4% and 21.7% fewer incorrect answers on POPQA and GPQA, respectively. Crucially, these factuality gains come without performance degradation on instruction following, math, or code, whereas continuous-reward RL, despite improving factuality, induces quality regressions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 02774d0c-e90b-461a-a595-5a4a345ccdf8Cited by top-tier papers2
- Reinforced Informativeness Optimization for Long-Form Retrieval-Augmented GenerationYuhao Wang, Ruiyang Ren, Yucheng Wang, Xin Zhao et al.ACL 2026 · 4 citations
- TruthRL: Incentivizing Truthful LLMs via Reinforcement LearningZhepei Wei, Xiao Yang, Kai Sun, Jiaqi Wang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on17
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
- Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable DomainsAnisha Gunjal, Anthony Wang, Elaine Lau, Vaskar Nath et al.ICLR 2026 · 340 citations
- Fine-Tuning Language Models for FactualityKatherine Tian, Eric Mitchell, Huaxiu Yao, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICLR 2024 · 270 citations
- When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric MemoriesAlex Mallen, Akari Asai, Victor Zhong, Rajarshi Das et al.ACL 2023 · 233 citations
Related papers
- Do Retrieval Augmented Language Models Know When They Don't Know?Youchao Zhou, Heyan Huang, Yicheng Liu, Rui Dai et al.AAAI 2026
- Improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningYiqun Chen, Lingyong Yan, Weiwei Sun, Xinyu Ma et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 47 citations
- LCR-RAG: Enhancing Logical Consistency in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Neuro-symbolic Reinforcement LearningWenxiang Zheng, Guo Tang, Shixin Jiang, Liangyu Huo et al.ACL 2026
- Learning to Reason for FactualityXilun Chen, Ilia Kulikov, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Barlas Oğuz et al.ICML 2026 · 22 citations
- KnowRL: Exploring Knowledgeable Reinforcement Learning for FactualityBaochang Ren, Shuofei Qiao, Ningyu Zhang, Da Zheng et al.ACL 2026 · 12 citations
