Which Artificial Intelligences Do People Care About Most? A Conjoint Experiment on Moral Consideration
Ali Ladak, Jamie Harris, Jacy Reese Anthis
Abstract
Many studies have identified particular features of artificial intelligences (AI), such as their autonomy and emotion expression, that affect the extent to which they are treated as subjects of moral consideration. However, there has not yet been a comparison of the relative importance of features as is necessary to design and understand increasingly capable, multi-faceted AI systems. We conducted an online conjoint experiment in which 1,163 participants evaluated descriptions of AIs that varied on these features. All 11 features increased how morally wrong participants considered it to harm the AIs. The largest effects were from human-like physical bodies and prosociality (i.e., emotion expression, emotion recognition, cooperation, and moral judgment). For human-computer interaction designers, the importance of prosociality suggests that, because AIs are often seen as threatening, the highest levels of moral consideration may only be granted if the AI has positive intentions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 02693db5-7771-4b96-bcae-066da1aa9bb9Cited by top-tier papers7
- FineCLIPER: Multi-modal Fine-grained CLIP for Dynamic Facial Expression Recognition with AdaptERsHaodong Chen, Haojian Huang, Junhao Dong, Mingzhe Zheng et al.ACM MM 2024 · 26 citations
- Perceptions of Sentient AI and Other Digital Minds: Evidence from the AI, Morality, and Sentience (AIMS) SurveyJacy Reese Anthis, Janet V. T. Pauketat, Ali Ladak, Aikaterina ManoliCHI 2025 · 24 citations
- Mental Models of Autonomy and Sentience Shape Reactions to AIJanet V. T. Pauketat, Daniel B. Shank, Aikaterina Manoli, Jacy Reese AnthisCHI 2026 · 7 citations
- Digital Companionship: Overlapping Uses of AI Companions and AI AssistantsAikaterina Manoli, Janet V. T. Pauketat, Ali Ladak, Hayoun Noh et al.CHI 2026 · 7 citations
- Are We Automating the Joy Out of Work? Designing AI to Augment Work, Not MeaningJaspreet Ranjit, Ke Zhou, Swabha Swayamdipta, Daniele QuerciaCHI 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on4
- Collecting the Public Perception of AI and Robot RightsGabriel Lima, Changyeon Kim, Seungho Ryu, Chihyung Jeon et al.CSCW 2020 · 53 citations
- Do You Mind? User Perceptions of Machine ConsciousnessAva Elizabeth Scott, Daniel Peter Neumann, Jasmin Niess, Pawel W. WozniakCHI 2023 · 44 citations
- "Should I Follow the Human, or Follow the Robot?" - Robots in Power Can Have More Influence Than Humans on Decision-MakingYoyo Tsung-Yu Hou, Wen-Ying Lee, Malte F. JungCHI 2023 · 27 citations
- "I Don't Want To Shoot The Android": Players Translate Real-Life Moral Intuitions to In-Game Decisions in Detroit: Become HumanKarina Arrambide, John Yoon, Cayley MacArthur, Katja Rogers et al.CHI 2022 · 11 citations
Related papers
- The AI Double Standard: Humans Judge All AIs for the Actions of OneAikaterina Manoli, Janet V. T. Pauketat, Jacy Reese AnthisCSCW 2025 · 10 citations
- Robots, Chatbots, Self-Driving Cars: Perceptions of Mind and Morality Across Artificial IntelligencesAli Ladak, Matti Wilks, Steve Loughnan, Jacy Reese AnthisCHI 2025 · 17 citations
- Can AI Be a Moral Victim? The Role of Moral Patiency and Ownership Perceptions in Ethical Judgments of Using AI-Generated ContentHyesun Choung, Soojong KimCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Mind in the Machine? Cross-Disciplinary Perceptions of Consciousness in Artificial IntelligenceHamid Moradi, Ignacio Avellino, Patrick Krauss, Dario Zanca et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Beyond Disposition: AI Knowledge Predicts Anthropomorphization of a Language Model Better Than Personality Traits in Lay and Expert PopulationsMartina Mara, Lara Bauer, Marisa Victoria Tschopp, Hannah Grosswieser et al.CHI 2026 · 4 citations
