Risk-Averse Total-Reward Reinforcement Learning
Xihong Su, Jia Lin Hau, Gersi Doko, Kishan Panaganti, Marek Petrik
Abstract
Risk-averse total-reward Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) offer a promising framework for modeling and solving undiscounted infinite-horizon objectives. Existing model-based algorithms for risk measures like the entropic risk measure (ERM) and entropic value-at-risk (EVaR) are effective in small problems, but require full access to transition probabilities. We propose a Q-learning algorithm to compute the optimal stationary policy for total-reward ERM and EVaR objectives with strong convergence and performance guarantees. The algorithm and its optimality are made possible by ERM's dynamic consistency and elicitability. Our numerical results on tabular domains demonstrate quick and reliable convergence of the proposed Q-learning algorithm to the optimal risk-averse value function.
ties in multi-stage optimization formulations [17][18][19]44]. In particular, dynamic decision-making with ERM allows for the existence of dynamic programming equations and Markov or stationary optimal policies. In addition, in this work, we leverage the fact that ERM is elicitable, which means that it can be estimated by solving a linear regression problem [7,11].
The second risk measure we consider is entropic value-at-risk (EVaR), which is defined for a given risk level α ∈ (0, 1) and x ∈ X as
and is extended to EVaR 0 [x] = ess inf[x] and EVaR 1 [x] = E[x] [2]. It is important to note that the supremum in (2) may not be attained even when x is a finite discrete random variable [3]. EVaR addresses several important shortcomings of ERM [17-19, 44]. In particular, EVaR is coherent and closely approximates popular and interpretable quantile-based risk measures, like VaR and CVaR [2, 19].
We formulate the decision process as a Markov Decision Process (MDP)
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 02550d09-79ca-46c9-8916-cb34722131c3Builds on15
- Being Optimistic to Be Conservative: Quickly Learning a CVaR PolicyRamtin Keramati, Christoph Dann, Alex Tamkin, Emma BrunskillAAAI 2020 · 86 citations
- Risk-Averse Offline Reinforcement LearningNúria Armengol Urpí, Sebastian Curi, Andreas KrauseICLR 2021 · 81 citations
- Exponential Bellman Equation and Improved Regret Bounds for Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement LearningYingjie Fei, Zhuoran Yang, Yudong Chen, Zhaoran WangNeurIPS 2021 · 70 citations
- Efficient Risk-Averse Reinforcement LearningIdo Greenberg, Yinlam Chow, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Shie MannorNeurIPS 2022 · 61 citations
- Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Risk-Sensitive PoliciesShiau Hong Lim, Ilyas MalikNeurIPS 2022 · 54 citations
Related papers
- Risk-averse Total-reward MDPs with ERM and EVaRXihong Su, Marek Petrik, Julien Grand-ClémentAAAI 2025 · 3 citations
- On Dynamic Programming Decompositions of Static Risk Measures in Markov Decision ProcessesJia Lin Hau, Erick Delage, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Marek PetrikNeurIPS 2023 · 22 citations
- Constrained Risk-Averse Markov Decision ProcessesMohamadreza Ahmadi, Ugo Rosolia, Michel D. Ingham, Richard M. Murray et al.AAAI 2021 · 31 citations
- Planning and Learning in Average Risk-aware MDPsWeikai Wang, Erick DelageNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Regret Bounds for Markov Decision Processes with Recursive Optimized Certainty EquivalentsWenhao Xu, Xuefeng Gao, Xuedong HeICML 2023 · 14 citations
