Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Risk-Sensitive Policies
Shiau Hong Lim, Ilyas Malik
Abstract
We address the problem of learning a risk-sensitive policy based on the CVaR risk measure using distributional reinforcement learning. In particular, we show that the standard action-selection strategy when applying the distributional Bellman optimality operator can result in convergence to neither the dynamic, Markovian CVaR nor the static, non-Markovian CVaR. We propose modifications to the existing algorithms that include a new distributional Bellman operator and show that the proposed strategy greatly expands the utility of distributional RL in learning and representing CVaR-optimized policies. Our proposed approach is a simple extension of standard distributional RL algorithms and can therefore take advantage of many of the recent advances in deep RL. On both synthetic and real data, we empirically show that our proposed algorithm is able to learn better CVaRoptimized policies. Recently, the distributional approach to RL (Bellemare et al., 2017; Morimura et al., 2010) has received increased attention due to its ability to learn better policies than the standard approaches in many challenging tasks (Dabney et al., 2018a,b; Yang et al., 2019) . Instead of learning a value function that provides the expected return of each state-action pair, the distributional approach learns the entire return distribution of each state-action pair. The approach itself is a simple extension to standard RL and is therefore easy to implement and able to leverage many of the advances in deep RL. Since the entire distribution is available, one naturally considers exploiting this information to optimize for an objective other than the expectation. Dabney et al. (2018a) presented a simple way to 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a0e9e6ff-81cf-4cff-9e79-0035e4ad3e5eCited by top-tier papers23
- Distributional Pareto-Optimal Multi-Objective Reinforcement LearningXin-Qiang Cai, Pushi Zhang, Li Zhao, Jiang Bian et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 46 citations
- RiskQ: Risk-sensitive Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Value FactorizationSiqi Shen, Chennan Ma, Chao Li, Weiquan Liu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 34 citations
- Train Hard, Fight Easy: Robust Meta Reinforcement LearningIdo Greenberg, Shie Mannor, Gal Chechik, Eli A. MeiromNeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
- Distributional Model Equivalence for Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement LearningTyler Kastner, Murat A. Erdogdu, Amir-massoud FarahmandNeurIPS 2023 · 9 citations
- Action Gaps and Advantages in Continuous-Time Distributional Reinforcement LearningHarley Wiltzer, Marc G. Bellemare, David Meger, Patrick Shafto et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Beyond CVaR: Leveraging Static Spectral Risk Measures for Enhanced Decision-Making in Distributional Reinforcement LearningMehrdad Moghimi, Hyejin KuICML 2025
- Two steps to risk sensitivityChris Gagne, Peter DayanNeurIPS 2021 · 17 citations
- Near-Minimax-Optimal Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning with CVaRKaiwen Wang, Nathan Kallus, Wen SunICML 2023 · 36 citations
- Pitfall of Optimism: Distributional Reinforcement Learning by Randomizing Risk CriterionTaehyun Cho, Seungyub Han, Heesoo Lee, Kyungjae Lee et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10 citations
- Conservative Offline Distributional Reinforcement LearningYecheng Jason Ma, Dinesh Jayaraman, Osbert BastaniNeurIPS 2021 · 118 citations
