From Principle to Practice: Vertical Data Minimization for Machine Learning
Robin Staab, Nikola Jovanovic, Mislav Balunovic, Martin T. Vechev
Abstract
Aiming to train and deploy predictive models, organizations collect large amounts of detailed client data, risking the exposure of private information in the event of a breach. To mitigate this, policymakers increasingly demand compliance with the data minimization (DM) principle, restricting data collection to only that data which is relevant and necessary for the task. Despite regulatory pressure, the problem of deploying machine learning models that obey DM has so far received little attention. In this work, we address this challenge in a comprehensive manner. We propose a novel vertical DM (vDM) workflow based on data generalization, which by design ensures that no full-resolution client data is collected during training and deployment of models, benefiting client privacy by reducing the attack surface in case of a breach. We formalize and study the corresponding problem of finding generalizations that both maximize data utility and minimize empirical privacy risk, which we quantify by introducing a diverse set of policy-aligned adversarial scenarios. Finally, we propose a range of baseline vDM algorithms, as well as Privacy-aware Tree (PAT), an especially effective vDM algorithm that outperforms all baselines across several settings. We plan to release our code as a publicly available library, helping advance the standardization of DM for machine learning. Overall, we believe our work can help lay the foundation for further exploration and adoption of DM principles in real-world applications.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 023be87a-de73-47f1-836c-2865ad3cd7f2Builds on19
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- GAZELLE: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network InferenceChiraag Juvekar, Vinod Vaikuntanathan, Anantha P. ChandrakasanUSENIX Security 2018 · 1,075 citations
- Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in TrainingMansheej Paul, Surya Ganguli, Gintare Karolina DziugaiteNeurIPS 2021 · 806 citations
- Oblivious Neural Network Predictions via MiniONN TransformationsJian Liu, Mika Juuti, Yao Lu, N. AsokanCCS 2017 · 800 citations
Related papers
- How Far Are We from Automatically Identifying Violations of the Data Minimization Principle in Privacy Policies?Ziyan Zhou, Yanru He, Yunchuan Guo, Haoyang Yu et al.SIGIR 2026
- Towards Learning on Vertically Partitioned Data with Distributed Differential PrivacyErgute Bao, Fei Wei, Yin Yang, Xiaokui Xiao et al.ICDE 2025 · 1 citation
- Operationalizing Data Minimization for Privacy-Preserving LLM PromptingJijie Zhou, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Tianshi LiICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- Privacy Preserving Vertical Federated Learning for Tree-based ModelsYuncheng Wu, Shaofeng Cai, Xiaokui Xiao, Gang Chen et al.VLDB 2020 · 259 citations
- Algorithmic Data Minimization for Machine Learning over Internet-of-Things Data StreamsTed Shaowang, Shinan Liu, Jonatas Marques, Nick Feamster et al.VLDB 2025
