Beyond Checkmate: Exploring the Creative Choke Points for AI Generated Texts
Nafis Irtiza Tripto, Saranya Venkatraman, Mahjabin Nahar, Dongwon Lee
Abstract
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized text generation but also raised concerns about potential misuse, making detecting LLM-generated text (AI text) increasingly essential. While prior work has focused on identifying AI text and effectively checkmating it, our study investigates a less-explored territory: portraying the nuanced distinctions between human and AI texts across text segments (introduction, body, and conclusion). Whether LLMs excel or falter in incorporating linguistic ingenuity across text segments, the results will critically inform their viability and boundaries as effective creative assistants to humans. Through an analogy with the structure of chess games, comprising opening, middle, and end games, we analyze segment-specific patterns to reveal where the most striking differences lie. Although AI texts closely resemble human writing in the body segment due to its length, deeper analysis shows a higher divergence in features dependent on the continuous flow of language, making it the most informative segment for detection. Additionally, human texts exhibit greater stylistic variation across segments, offering a new lens for distinguishing them from AI. Overall, our findings provide fresh insights into human-AI text differences and pave the way for more effective and interpretable detection strategies. Codes available at https://github.com/tripto03/chess inspired human ai text distinction . Opening Mid game End game
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 02030e80-4d90-4af9-8df4-5e2074d33994Builds on7
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
- RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial LearningXiaomeng Hu, Pin-Yu Chen, Tsung-Yi HoNeurIPS 2023 · 315 citations
- Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated TextAbhimanyu Hans, Avi Schwarzschild, Valeriia Cherepanova, Hamid Kazemi et al.ICML 2024 · 262 citations
- Aligning Superhuman AI with Human Behavior: Chess as a Model SystemReid McIlroy-Young, Siddhartha Sen, Jon M. Kleinberg, Ashton AndersonKDD 2020 · 77 citations
- MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the WildYafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi et al.ACL 2024 · 44 citations
Related papers
- DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive LearningXun Guo, Yongxin He, Shan Zhang, Ting Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 100 citations
- DNA-DetectLLM: Unveiling AI-Generated Text via a DNA-Inspired Mutation-Repair ParadigmXiaowei Zhu, Yubing Ren, Fang Fang, Qingfeng Tan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Linguistic and Embedding-Based Profiling of Texts Generated by Humans and Large Language ModelsSergio E. Zanotto, Segun AroyehunEMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
- PaLD: Detection of Text Partially Written by Large Language ModelsEric Lei, Hsiang Hsu, Chun-Fu ChenICLR 2025
- Raidar: geneRative AI Detection viA RewritingChengzhi Mao, Carl Vondrick, Hao Wang, Junfeng YangICLR 2024 · 66 citations
