Lune

EMNLP Findings2025

Disentangling Language Understanding and Reasoning Structures in Cross-lingual Chain-of-Thought Prompting

Khanh-Tung Tran, Nguyet-Hang Vu, Barry O'Sullivan, Hoang D. Nguyen

Abstract

Cross-lingual chain-of-thought prompting techniques have proven effective for investigating diverse reasoning paths in Large Language Models (LLMs), especially for low-resource languages. Despite these empirical gains, the mechanisms underlying cross-lingual improvements remain perplexing. This study, therefore, addresses whether the benefits of cross-lingual prompting arise from reasoning structures intrinsic to each language, or are simply a consequence of improved comprehension through cross-linguistic exposure. We employ neuron intervention and perturbation techniques to analyze and deactivate language-specific reasoning neurons during cross-lingual prompting, leading to performance disparities across languages, upto 27.4%. Our findings disentangle that these neurons are essential for reasoning in their respective languages but have minimal effect on reasoning in other languages, providing evidence for the existence of language-specific local reasoning structures and guiding the development of more interpretable and effective multilingual AI systems. 1

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers1

  1. Less Languages, Less Tokens: An Efficient Unified Logic Cross-lingual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning FrameworkChenyuan Zhang, Qiguang Chen, Xie Chen, Zhuotao Tian et al.ACL 2026

Builds on14

  1. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
  2. Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at ScaleAlexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal, Vishrav Chaudhary et al.ACL 2020 · 539 citations
  3. How do Large Language Models Handle Multilingualism?Yiran Zhao, Wenxuan Zhang, Guizhen Chen, Kenji Kawaguchi et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 196 citations
  4. Why think step by step? Reasoning emerges from the locality of experienceBen Prystawski, Michael Li, Noah D. GoodmanNeurIPS 2023 · 168 citations
  5. Not All Languages Are Created Equal in LLMs: Improving Multilingual Capability by Cross-Lingual-Thought PromptingHaoyang Huang, Tianyi Tang, Dongdong Zhang, Xin Zhao et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 76 citations

Related papers

  1. When Less Language is More: Language-Reasoning Disentanglement Makes LLMs Better Multilingual ReasonersWeixiang Zhao, Jiahe Guo, Yang Deng, Tongtong Wu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
  2. Reasoning Transfer for an Extremely Low-Resource and Endangered Language: Bridging Languages Through Sample-Efficient Language UnderstandingKhanh-Tung Tran, Barry O'Sullivan, Hoang D. NguyenAAAI 2026 · 4 citations
  3. Bridging the Language Gap: Uncovering and Aligning Shared Circuits for Multi-Hop Reasoning in Multilingual LLMsChenghao Sun, Zhen Huang, Yonggang Zhang, Xinmei Tian et al.AAAI 2026
  4. Empowering Multi-step Reasoning across Languages via Program-Aided Language ModelsLeonardo Ranaldi, Giulia Pucci, Barry Haddow, Alexandra BirchEMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
  5. Large Reasoning Models Are (Not Yet) Multilingual Latent ReasonersYihong Liu, Raoyuan Zhao, Hinrich Schütze, Michael A. HedderichACL Findings 2026
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines