On the Exploitability of Instruction Tuning
Manli Shu, Jiongxiao Wang, Chen Zhu, Jonas Geiping, Chaowei Xiao, Tom Goldstein
摘要
Instruction tuning is an effective technique to align large language models (LLMs) with human intents. In this work, we investigate how an adversary can exploit instruction tuning by injecting specific instruction-following examples into the training data that intentionally changes the model's behavior. For example, an adversary can achieve content injection by injecting training examples that mention target content and eliciting such behavior from downstream models. To achieve this goal, we propose AutoPoison, an automated data poisoning pipeline. It naturally and coherently incorporates versatile attack goals into poisoned data with the help of an oracle LLM. We showcase two example attacks: content injection and over-refusal attacks, each aiming to induce a specific exploitable behavior. We quantify and benchmark the strength and the stealthiness of our data poisoning scheme. Our results show that AutoPoison allows an adversary to change a model's behavior by poisoning only a small fraction of data while maintaining a high level of stealthiness in the poisoned examples. We hope our work sheds light on how data quality affects the behavior of instruction-tuned models and raises awareness of the importance of data quality for responsible deployments of LLMs. Code is available at https://github.com/azshue/AutoPoison.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper43
- Exploiting LLM QuantizationKazuki Egashira, Mark Vero, Robin Staab, Jingxuan He 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 104 次
- Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM AdaptationDanny Halawi, Alexander Wei, Eric Wallace, Tony Tong Wang 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 77 次
- Shadowcast: Stealthy Data Poisoning Attacks Against Vision-Language ModelsYuancheng Xu, Jiarui Yao, Manli Shu, Yanchao Sun 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 67 次
- NLSR: Neuron-Level Safety Realignment of Large Language Models Against Harmful Fine-TuningXin Yi, Shunfan Zheng, Linlin Wang, Gerard de Melo 等AAAI 2025 · 被引用 38 次
- Star-Agents: Automatic Data Optimization with LLM Agents for Instruction TuningHang Zhou, Yehui Tang, Haochen Qin, Yujie Yang 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 21 次
它引用的顶会 Paper20
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 7,905 次
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 4,966 次
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 被引用 3,228 次
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 被引用 2,496 次
相关 Paper
- Poisoning Language Models During Instruction TuningAlexander Wan, Eric Wallace, Sheng Shen, Dan KleinICML 2023 · 被引用 319 次
- Merging Triggers, Breaking Backdoors: Defensive Poisoning for Instruction-Tuned Language ModelsSan Kim, Gary LeeACL 2026
- PoisonBench: Assessing Language Model Vulnerability to Poisoned Preference DataTingchen Fu, Mrinank Sharma, Philip Torr, Shay B. Cohen 等ICML 2025
- MetaPoison: Practical General-purpose Clean-label Data PoisoningW. Ronny Huang, Jonas Geiping, Liam Fowl, Gavin Taylor 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 242 次
- Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow InstructionsFederico Bianchi, Mirac Suzgun, Giuseppe Attanasio, Paul Röttger 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 373 次
