Fine-Grained and Controlled Rewriting in Blockchains: Chameleon-Hashing Gone Attribute-Based
David Derler, Kai Samelin, Daniel Slamanig, Christoph Striecks
摘要
Blockchain technologies recently received a considerable amount of attention. While the initial focus was mainly on the use of blockchains in the context of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, application scenarios now go far beyond this. Most blockchains have the property that once some object, e.g., a block or a transaction, has been registered to be included into the blockchain, it is persisted and there are no means to modify it again. While this is an essential feature of most blockchain scenarios, it is still often desirable-at times it may be even legally required-to allow for breaking this immutability in a controlled way. Only recently, Ateniese et al. (EUROS&P 2017) proposed an elegant solution to this problem on the block level. Thereby, the authors replace standard hash functions with so-called chameleon-hashes (Krawczyk and Rabin, NDSS 2000). While their work seems to offer a suitable solution to the problem of controlled re-writing of blockchains, their approach is too coarse-grained in that it only offers an all-or-nothing solution. We revisit this idea and introduce the novel concept of policybased chameleon-hashes (PCH). PCHs generalize the notion of chameleon-hashes by giving the party computing a hash the ability to associate access policies to the generated hashes. Anyone who possesses enough privileges to satisfy the policy can then find arbitrary collisions for a given hash. We then apply this concept to transaction-level rewriting within blockchains, and thus support fine-grained and controlled modifiability of blockchain objects. Besides modeling PCHs, we present a generic construction of PCHs (using a strengthened version of chameleon-hashes with ephemeral trapdoors which we also introduce), rigorously prove its security, and instantiate it with efficient building blocks. We report first implementation results.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper1
相关 Paper
- Phoenix: Detect and Locate Resilience Issues in Blockchain via Context-Sensitive ChaosFuchen Ma, Yuanliang Chen, Yuanhang Zhou, Jingxuan Sun 等CCS 2023 · 被引用 10 次
- Redactable Blockchain in the Permissionless SettingDominic Deuber, Bernardo Magri, Sri Aravinda Krishnan ThyagarajanS&P 2019 · 被引用 153 次
- vChain+: Optimizing Verifiable Blockchain Boolean Range QueriesHaixin Wang, Cheng Xu, Ce Zhang, Jianliang Xu 等ICDE 2022 · 被引用 95 次
- SChain: Scalable Concurrency over Flexible Permissioned BlockchainXiaodong Qi, Zhihao Chen, Haizhen Zhuo, Quanqing Xu 等ICDE 2023 · 被引用 17 次
- Poros: Secure and Highly Parallel Sharding Blockchain with Optimized Cross-Shard Transaction ProcessingZhuocheng Pan, Jianwei Liu, Andi Liu, Yuxuan Hu 等CCS 2026
