Posterior Behavioral Cloning: Pretraining BC Policies for Efficient RL Finetuning
Andrew Wagenmaker, Perry Dong, Raymond Tsao, Chelsea Finn, Sergey Levine
摘要
Standard practice across domains from robotics to language is to first pretrain a policy on a large-scale demonstration dataset, and then finetune this policy, typically with reinforcement learning (RL), in order to improve performance on deployment domains. This finetuning step has proved critical in achieving human or super-human performance, yet while much attention has been given to developing more effective finetuning algorithms, little attention has been given to ensuring the pretrained policy is an effective initialization for RL finetuning. In this work we seek to understand how the pretrained policy affects finetuning performance, and how to pretrain policies in order to ensure they are effective initializations for finetuning. We first show theoretically that standard behavioral cloning (BC)-which trains a policy to directly match the actions played by the demonstrator-can fail to ensure coverage over the demonstrator's actions, a minimal condition necessary for effective RL finetuning. We then show that if, instead of exactly fitting the observed demonstrations, we train a policy to model the posterior distribution of the demonstrator's behavior given the demonstration dataset, we do obtain a policy that ensures coverage over the demonstrator's actions, enabling more effective finetuning. Furthermore, this policy-which we refer to as the posterior behavioral cloning (POSTBC) policy-achieves this while ensuring pretrained performance is no worse than that of the BC policy. We then show that POSTBC is practically implementable with modern generative models in robotic control domainsrelying only on standard supervised learning-and leads to significantly improved RL finetuning performance on both realistic robotic control benchmarks and realworld robotic manipulation tasks, as compared to standard behavioral cloning.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- TQL: Scaling Q-Functions with Transformers by Preventing Attention CollapsePerry Dong, Kuo-Han Hung, Alexander Swerdlow, Dorsa Sadigh 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 7 次
- From Prior to Pro: Efficient Skill Mastery via Distribution Contractive RL FinetuningZhanyi Sun, shuran songICML 2026 · 被引用 6 次
它引用的顶会 Paper38
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 35,902 次
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Denoising Diffusion Implicit ModelsJiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, Stefano ErmonICLR 2021 · 被引用 11,743 次
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 10,924 次
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 被引用 1,402 次
相关 Paper
- PIRLNav: Pretraining with Imitation and RL Finetuning for OBJECTNAVRam Ramrakhya, Dhruv Batra, Erik Wijmans, Abhishek DasCVPR 2023
- Self-Improving Embodied Foundation ModelsSeyed Kamyar Seyed Ghasemipour, Ayzaan Wahid, Jonathan Tompson, Pannag Sanketi 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 38 次
- Active Fine-Tuning of Multi-Task PoliciesMarco Bagatella, Jonas Hübotter, Georg Martius, Andreas KrauseICML 2025
- Behavioral Mode Discovery for Fine-tuning Multimodal Generative PoliciesAlberta Longhini, David Emukpere, Jean-Michel Renders, Seungsu KimICML 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Should I Run Offline Reinforcement Learning or Behavioral Cloning?Aviral Kumar, Joey Hong, Anikait Singh, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 被引用 84 次
