The Midas Touch: Triggering the Capability of LLMs for RM-API Misuse Detection
Yi Yang, Jinghua Liu, Kai Chen, Miaoqian Lin
摘要
As the basis of software resource management (RM), strictly following the RM-API constraints guarantees secure resource management and software. To enhance the RM-API application, researchers find it effective in detecting RM-API misuse on open-source software according to RM-API constraints retrieved from documentation and code. However, the current pattern-matching constraint retrieval methods have limitations: the documentation-based methods leave many API constraints irregularly distributed or involving neutral sentiment undiscovered; the code-based methods result in many false bugs due to incorrect API usage since not all high-frequency usages are correct. Therefore, people propose to utilize Large Language Models (LLMs) for RM-API constraint retrieval with their potential on text analysis and generation. However, directly using LLMs has limitations due to the hallucinations. The LLMs fabricate answers without expertise leaving many RM APIs undiscovered and generating incorrect answers even with evidence introducing incorrect RM-API constraints and false bugs.
In this paper, we propose an LLM-empowered RM-API misuse detection solution, ChatDetector, which fully automates LLMs for documentation understanding which helps RM-API constraints retrieval and RM-API misuse detection. To correctly retrieve the RM-API constraints, ChatDetector is inspired by the ReAct framework which is optimized based on Chain-of-Thought (CoT) to decompose the complex task into allocation APIs identification, RM-object (allocated/released by RM APIs) extraction and RM-APIs pairing (RM APIs usually exist in pairs). It first verifies the semantics of allocation APIs based on the retrieved RM sentences from API documentation through LLMs. Inspired by the LLMs' performance on various prompting methods, ChatDetector adopts a two-dimensional prompting approach for cross-validation. At the same time, an inconsistency-checking approach between the LLMs' output and the reasoning process is adopted for the allocation APIs confirmation with an off-the-shelf Natural Language Processing (NLP) tool. To accurately pair the RM-APIs, ChatDetector decomposes the task again and identifies the RM-object type first, with which it can then accurately pair the releasing APIs and further construct the RM-API constraints for misuse detection. With the diminished hallucinations, ChatDetector identifies 165 pairs of RM-APIs with a precision of 98.21% compared with the state-of-the-art API detectors. By employing a static detector CodeQL, we ethically report 115 security bugs on the applications integrating on six popular libraries to the developers, which may result in severe issues, such as Denial-of-Services (DoS) and memory corruption. Compared with the end-to-end benchmark method, the result shows that ChatDetector can retrieve at least 47% more RM sentences and 80.85% more RM-API constraints. Since no work exists specified in utilizing LLMs for RM-API misuse detection to our best knowledge, the inspiring results show that LLMs can assist in generating more constraints beyond expertise and can be used for bug detection. It also indicates that future research could transfer from overcoming the bottlenecks of traditional NLP tools to creatively utilizing LLMs for security research.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper4
- Incident Response Planning Using a Lightweight Large Language Model with Reduced HallucinationKim Hammar, Tansu Alpcan, Emil C. LupuNDSS 2026 · 被引用 16 次
- LineBreaker: Finding Token-Inconsistency Bugs with Large Language ModelsHongbo Chen, Yifan Zhang, Xing Han, Tianhao Mao 等ASE 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- BugAuditor: Detecting Bugs via Inconsistent Defensive Code AuditingMiaoqian Lin, Kai Chen, Hao ChenUSENIX Security 2026
- Patch-Guided Vulnerability Detection: Extracting Java API Security Rules via Attack–Defense Cross-AnalysisBofei Chen, Shuang Liao, Lei Zhang, Chibin Zhang 等USENIX Security 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper17
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Automated Program Repair in the Era of Large Pre-trained Language ModelsChunqiu Steven Xia, Yuxiang Wei, Lingming ZhangICSE 2023 · 被引用 321 次
- Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Fuzzers: Fuzzing Deep-Learning Libraries via Large Language ModelsYinlin Deng, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Haoran Peng, Chenyuan Yang 等ISSTA 2023 · 被引用 253 次
- Prompting Is All You Need: Automated Android Bug Replay with Large Language ModelsSidong Feng, Chunyang ChenICSE 2024 · 被引用 143 次
相关 Paper
- Demystifying and Detecting Misuses of Deep Learning APIsMoshi Wei, Nima Shiri Harzevili, Yuekai Huang, Jinqiu Yang 等ICSE 2024 · 被引用 13 次
- Beyond Static Pattern Matching? Rethinking Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMsYifan Xia, Zichen Xie, Peiyu Liu, Kangjie Lu 等ISSTA 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- RBCTest: Leveraging LLMs to Mine and Verify Oracles of API Response Bodies for RESTful API TestingHieu Huynh, Quoc-Tri Le, Tu Nguyen, Viet Nguyen 等ICSE 2026
- Boosting Static Resource Leak Detection via LLM-based Resource-Oriented Intention InferenceChong Wang, Jianan Liu, Xin Peng, Yang Liu 等ICSE 2025 · 被引用 5 次
- Generating API Parameter Security Rules with LLM for API Misuse DetectionJinghua Liu, Yi Yang, Kai Chen, Miaoqian LinNDSS 2025
