Mapping a Movement: Exploring a Proposed Police Training Facility in Atlanta and its Opposition Movement through Online Maps
Camille Harris, Clio Andris
摘要
Fig. 1. A sample of maps retrieved from online sources that describe aspects of a proposed police training facility (colloquially known as Cop City) in Atlanta, Georgia, from proponents of the facility, the mass media, and activists who oppose the plan.
In 2021, the City of Atlanta and Atlanta Police Foundation launched plans to build a large police training facility in the South River Forest in unincorporated DeKalb County, GA. Residents of Atlanta and DeKalb County, environmental activists, police and prison abolitionists, and other activists and concerned individuals formed the movement in opposition to the facility, known as the Stop Cop City / Defend the Atlanta Forest movement. Social media and digital maps became common tools for communicating information about the facility and the movement. Here, we examine online maps about the facility and the opposition movement, originating from grassroots organizations, the City of Atlanta, news media outlets, the Atlanta Police Foundation, and individuals. We gather and examine 32 publicly available maps collected through the Google Search API, Twitter (now X), Instagram and reddit. Using a framework of critical cartography, we conduct a content analysis of these maps to identify the mapping technologies and techniques (data, cartographic elements, styles) used by different stakeholders and roles that maps and mapping technologies can play in social movements. Finally, we examine the extent to which these maps provide data to confirm or contradict concerns raised by grassroots organizations and local residents about the facility. We find that stakeholders and mapmakers use geo-spatial tools in different ways and likely have varied access to mapping technologies. We argue that documenting the use of maps to communicate information about a contentious project can help enumerate community positions and perspectives and we advocate for accessible mapmaking tools. We conclude by discussing the implications of accessibility of mapping technology and posting maps to social media, and share example map images that extend the geographic information systems (GIS) techniques seen in the retrieved maps.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI; Geographic visualization.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper4
- Critical Race Theory for HCIIhudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, Angela D. R. Smith, Alexandra To, Kentaro ToyamaCHI 2020 · 被引用 397 次
- Dilemmas in Mutual Aid: Lessons for Crisis Informatics from an Emergent Community Response to the PandemicRobert Soden, Embry OwenCSCW 2021 · 被引用 55 次
- Supporting Youth Activists? Strategic Use of Social Media: A Qualitative Investigation of Design OpportunitiesFarnaz Irannejad Bisafar, Brooke Foucault Welles, Catherine D'Ignazio, Andrea G. ParkerCSCW 2020 · 被引用 17 次
- The Unseen Landscape of Abolitionism: Examining the Role of Digital Maps in Grassroots OrganizingDashiel Carrera, Ufuoma Ovienmhada, Safa Hussein, Robert SodenCSCW 2023 · 被引用 12 次
相关 Paper
- Toward a Grassroots Culture of Technology PracticeSucheta Ghoshal, Rishma Mendhekar, Amy S. BruckmanCSCW 2020 · 被引用 60 次
- Probing a Community-Based Conversational Storytelling Agent to Document Digital Stories of Housing InsecurityBrett A. Halperin, Gary Hsieh, Erin McElroy, James Pierce 等CHI 2023 · 被引用 43 次
- More Than a Property: Place-based Meaning Making and Mobilization on Social Media to Resist GentrificationSeolha Lee, Christopher A. Le DantecCSCW 2023 · 被引用 4 次
- Situating Datasets: Making Public Eviction Data Actionable for Housing JusticeAnh-Ton Tran, Grace Guo, Jordan Taylor, Katsuki Andrew Chan 等CHI 2024 · 被引用 20 次
- Bridging Action Frames: Instagram Infographics in U.S. Ethnic MovementsDarya Kaviani, Niloufar SalehiCSCW 2022 · 被引用 9 次
