Epistemic EFX Allocations Exist for Monotone Valuations
Hannaneh Akrami, Nidhi Rathi
摘要
We study the fundamental problem of fairly dividing a set of indivisible items among agents with (general) monotone valuations. The notion of envy-freeness up to any item (EFX) is considered to be one of the most fascinating fairness concepts in this line of work. Unfortunately, despite significant efforts, existence of EFX allocations is a major open problem in fair division, thereby making the study of approximations and relaxations of EFX a natural line of research. Recently, Caragiannis et al. [2023] introduced a promising relaxation of EFX, called epistemic EFX (EEFX). We say an allocation to be EEFX if, for every agent, it is possible to shuffle the items in the remaining bundles so that she becomes "EFX-satisfied". Caragiannis et al. [2023] prove existence and polynomial-time computability of EEFX allocations for additive valuations. A natural question asks what happens when we consider valuations more general than additive? We address this important open question and answer it affirmatively by establishing the existence of EEFX allocations for an arbitrary number of agents with general monotone valuations. To the best of our knowledge, EEFX is the only known relaxation of EFX (beside EF1) to have such strong existential guarantees. Furthermore, we complement our existential result by proving computational and information-theoretic lower bounds. We prove that even for an arbitrary number of (more than one) agents with identical submodular valuations, it is PLS-hard to compute EEFX allocations and it requires exponentially-many value queries to do so.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper4
- Achieving Maximin Share and EFX/EF1 Guarantees SimultaneouslyHannaneh Akrami, Nidhi RathiAAAI 2025 · 被引用 9 次
- Probing EFX via PMMS: (Non-)Existence Results in Discrete Fair DivisionJaroslaw Byrka, Franciszek Malinka, Tomasz PonitkaAAAI 2026 · 被引用 4 次
- Dividing Indivisible Items for the Benefit of All: It Is Hard to Be Fair Without Social AwarenessArgyrios Deligkas, Eduard Eiben, Tiger-Lily Goldsmith, Dusan Knop 等AAAI 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Matroids are EquitableHannaneh Akrami, Roshan Raj, László A. VéghSODA 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper7
- Multiple Birds with One Stone: Beating 1/2 for EFX and GMMS via Envy Cycle EliminationGeorgios Amanatidis, Evangelos Markakis, Apostolos NtokosAAAI 2020 · 被引用 98 次
- A Little Charity Guarantees Almost Envy-FreenessBhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Telikepalli Kavitha, Kurt Mehlhorn, Alkmini SgouritsaSODA 2020 · 被引用 97 次
- Almost Full EFX Exists for Four AgentsBen Berger, Avi Cohen, Michal Feldman, Amos FiatAAAI 2022 · 被引用 74 次
- Almost Envy-freeness, Envy-rank, and Nash Social Welfare MatchingsAlireza Farhadi, Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi, Mohamad Latifian, Masoud Seddighin 等AAAI 2021 · 被引用 27 次
- Randomized and Deterministic Maximin-share Approximations for Fractionally Subadditive ValuationsHannaneh Akrami, Kurt Mehlhorn, Masoud Seddighin, Golnoosh ShahkaramiNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 27 次
相关 Paper
- Understanding EFX Allocations: Counting and VariantsTzeh Yuan Neoh, Nicholas TehAAAI 2025 · 被引用 4 次
- EFX and PO Allocation Exists for Two Types of GoodsVladimir Davidiuk, Yuriy Dementiev, Artur Ignatiev, Danil SagunovAAAI 2026
- (Almost Full) EFX for Three (and More) Types of AgentsPratik Ghosal, Vishwa Prakash HV, Prajakta Nimbhorkar, Nithin VarmaAAAI 2025 · 被引用 9 次
- EF2X Exists for Four AgentsArash Ashuri, Vasilis Gkatzelis, Alkmini SgouritsaAAAI 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Fair allocation of a multiset of indivisible itemsPranay Gorantla, Kunal Marwaha, Santhoshini VelusamySODA 2023 · 被引用 13 次
