Lune

CCS2016顶会

SFADiff: Automated Evasion Attacks and Fingerprinting Using Black-box Differential Automata Learning

George Argyros, Ioannis Stais, Suman Jana, Angelos D. Keromytis, Aggelos Kiayias

2016年份
65被引次数
14顶会引用

摘要

Finding differences between programs with similar functionality is an important security problem as such differences can be used for fingerprinting or creating evasion attacks against security software like Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) which are designed to detect malicious inputs to web applications. In this paper, we present SFADiff, a black-box differential testing framework based on Symbolic Finite Automata (SFA) learning. SFADiff can automatically find differences between a set of programs with comparable functionality. Unlike existing differential testing techniques, instead of searching for each difference individually, SFADiff infers SFA models of the target programs using black-box queries and systematically enumerates the differences between the inferred SFA models. All differences between the inferred models are checked against the corresponding programs. Any difference between the models, that does not result in a difference between the corresponding programs, is used as a counterexample for further refinement of the inferred models. SFADiff's model-based approach, unlike existing differential testing tools, also support fully automated root cause analysis in a domain-independent manner. We evaluate SFADiff in three different settings for finding discrepancies between: (i) three TCP implementations, (ii) four WAFs, and (iii) HTML/JavaScript parsing implementations in WAFs and web browsers. Our results demonstrate that SFADiff is able to identify and enumerate the differences systematically and efficiently in all these settings. We show that SFADiff is able to find differences not only between different WAFs but also between different versions of the same WAF. SFADiff is also able to discover three previously-unknown differences between the HTML/Java-Script parsers of two popular WAFs (PHPIDS 0.7 and Expose 2.4.0) and the corresponding parsers of Google Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer. We confirm that all these differences can be used to evade the WAFs and launch successful cross-site scripting attacks.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper14

问问它们各自怎么用它

它引用的顶会 Paper2

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖