FareShare: A Tool for Labor Organizers to Estimate Lost Wages and Contest Arbitrary AI and Algorithmic Deactivations CSCW016
Varun Nagaraj Rao, Samantha Dalal, Andrew Schwartz, Amna Liaqat, Dana Calacci, Andrés Monroy-Hernández
摘要
What happens when a rideshare driver is suddenly locked out of the platform connecting them to riders, wages, and daily work? Deactivation-the abrupt removal of gig workers' platform access-typically occurs through arbitrary AI and algorithmic decisions with little explanation or recourse. This represents one of the most severe forms of algorithmic control and often devastates workers' financial stability. Recent U.S. state policies now mandate appeals processes and recovering compensation during the period of wrongful deactivation based on past earnings. Yet, labor organizers still lack effective tools to support these complex, error-prone workflows. We designed FareShare, a computational tool automating lost wage estimation for deactivated drivers, through a 6 month partnership with the State of Washington's largest rideshare labor union. Over the following 3 months, our field deployment of FareShare registered 178 account signups. We observed that the tool could reduce lost wage calculation time by over 95%, eliminate manual data entry errors, and enable legal teams to generate arbitration-ready reports more efficiently. Beyond these gains, the deployment also surfaced important socio-technical challenges around trust, consent, and tool adoption in high-stakes labor contexts.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper7
- Disproportionate Removals and Differing Content Moderation Experiences for Conservative, Transgender, and Black Social Media Users: Marginalization and Moderation Gray AreasOliver L. Haimson, Daniel Delmonaco, Peipei Nie, Andrea WegnerCSCW 2021 · 被引用 287 次
- HCI Tactics for Politics from Below: Meeting the Challenges of Smart CitiesCedric Deslandes Whitney, Teresa Naval, Elizabeth Quepons, Simrandeep Singh 等CHI 2021 · 被引用 76 次
- Bargaining with the Black-Box: Designing and Deploying Worker-Centric Tools to Audit Algorithmic ManagementDan Calacci, Alex PentlandCSCW 2022 · 被引用 57 次
- The Future of HCI-Policy CollaborationQian Yang, Richmond Y. Wong, Steven J. Jackson, Sabine Junginger 等CHI 2024 · 被引用 51 次
- Stakeholder-Centered AI Design: Co-Designing Worker Tools with Gig Workers through Data ProbesAngie Zhang, Alexander Boltz, Jonathan Lynn, Chun Wei Wang 等CHI 2023 · 被引用 48 次
相关 Paper
- Reputation Agent: Prompting Fair Reviews in Gig MarketsCarlos Toxtli, Angela Richmond-Fuller, Saiph SavageWWW 2020 · 被引用 53 次
- Rideshare Transparency: Translating Gig Worker Insights on AI Platform Design to PolicyVarun Nagaraj Rao, Samantha Dalal, Eesha Agarwal, Dana Calacci 等CSCW 2025 · 被引用 17 次
- Organizing in the Digital Age: Understanding Community, Challenges, and Consequences in Digitally-facilitated Labor OrganizingFrederick Reiber, Alishah Chator, Dana Calacci, Allison McDonaldCSCW 2026
- Face Work: A Human-Centered Investigation into Facial Verification in Gig WorkElizabeth Anne WatkinsCSCW 2023 · 被引用 15 次
- Speculative Job Design: Probing Alternative Opportunities for Gig Workers in an Automated FutureShuhao Ma, Zhiming Liu, Valentina Nisi, Sarah E. Fox 等CHI 2025 · 被引用 15 次
