On the Power of Oblivious State Preparation
James Bartusek, Dakshita Khurana
摘要
We put forth Oblivious State Preparation (OSP) as a cryptographic primitive that unifies techniques developed in the context of a quantum server interacting with a classical client. OSP allows a classical polynomial-time sender to input a choice of one out of two public observables, and a quantum polynomial-time receiver to recover an eigenstate of the corresponding observable -- while keeping the sender's choice hidden from any malicious receiver. We obtain the following results: - The existence of (plain) trapdoor claw-free functions implies OSP, and the existence of dual-mode trapdoor claw-free functions implies round-optimal (two-round) OSP. - OSP implies the existence of proofs of quantumness, test of a qubit, blind classical delegation of quantum computation, and classical verification of quantum computation. - Two-round OSP implies quantum money with classical communication, classically-verifiable position verification, and (additionally assuming classical FHE with log-depth decryption) quantum FHE. Several of these applications were previously only known via tailored LWE-based constructions, whereas our OSP-based constructions yield new results from a wider variety of assumptions, including hard problems on cryptographic group actions. Finally, towards understanding the minimal hardness assumptions required to realize OSP, we prove the following: - OSP implies oblivious transfer between one classical and one quantum party. - Two-round OSP implies public-key encryption with classical keys and ciphertexts. In particular, these results help to ''explain'' the use of public-key cryptography in the known approaches to establishing a ''classical leash'' on a quantum server. For example, combined with a result of Austrin et al. (CRYPTO 22), we conclude that perfectly-correct OSP cannot exist unconditionally in the (quantum) random oracle model.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- A Modular Approach to Succinct Arguments for QMAJames Bartusek, Jiahui Liu, Giulio MalavoltaEUROCRYPT 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Proofs of No IntrusionVipul Goyal, Justin RaizesEUROCRYPT 2026 · 被引用 1 次
它引用的顶会 Paper12
- Verifiable Quantum Advantage without StructureTakashi Yamakawa, Mark ZhandryFOCS 2022 · 被引用 35 次
- Quantum Advantage from Any Non-local GameYael Kalai, Alex Lombardi, Vinod Vaikuntanathan, Lisa YangSTOC 2023 · 被引用 25 次
- Public-key Quantum money with a classical bankOmri ShmueliSTOC 2022 · 被引用 20 次
- On the Impossibility of Key Agreements from Quantum Random OraclesPer Austrin, Hao Chung, Kai-Min Chung, Shiuan Fu 等CRYPTO 2022 · 被引用 20 次
- Bounding the Quantum Value of Compiled Nonlocal Games: From CHSH to BQP VerificationAnand Natarajan, Tina ZhangFOCS 2023 · 被引用 18 次
相关 Paper
- Hard Quantum Extrapolations in Quantum CryptographyLuowen Qian, Justin Raizes, Mark ZhandryEUROCRYPT 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Quantum State Group ActionsSaachi Mutreja, Mark ZhandryCRYPTO 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- On the Cryptographic Futility of Non-collapsing MeasurementsAlper Çakan, Dakshita Khurana, Tomoyuki Morimae, Yuki Shirakawa 等EUROCRYPT 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Hidden Cosets and Applications to Unclonable CryptographyAndrea Coladangelo, Jiahui Liu, Qipeng Liu, Mark ZhandryCRYPTO 2021 · 被引用 64 次
- Classical Verification of Quantum Computations in Linear TimeJiayu ZhangFOCS 2022 · 被引用 9 次
