Causal Effect Regularization: Automated Detection and Removal of Spurious Correlations
Abhinav Kumar, Amit Deshpande, Amit Sharma
摘要
In many classification datasets, the task labels are spuriously correlated with some input attributes. Classifiers trained on such datasets often rely on these attributes for prediction, especially when the spurious correlation is high, and thus fail to generalize whenever there is a shift in the attributes’ correlation at deployment. If we assume that the spurious attributes are known a priori, several methods have been proposed to learn a classifier that is invariant to the specified attributes. However, in real-world data, information about spurious attributes is typically unavailable. Therefore, we propose a method that automatically identifies spurious attributes by estimating their causal effect on the label and then uses a regularization objective to mitigate the classifier’s reliance on them. Although causal effect of an attribute on the label is not always identified, we present two commonly occurring data-generating processes where the effect can be identified. Compared to recent work for identifying spurious attributes, we find that our method, AutoACER, is more accurate in removing the attribute from the learned model, especially when spurious correlation is high. Specifically, across synthetic, semi-synthetic, and real-world datasets, AutoACER shows significant improvement in a metric used to quantify the dependence of a classifier on spurious attributes ( ∆ Prob), while obtaining better or similar accuracy. Empirically we find that AutoACER mitigates the reliance on spurious attributes even under noisy estimation of causal effects or when the causal effect is not identified. To explain the empirical robustness of our method, we create a simple linear classification task with two sets of attributes: causal and spurious. Under this setting, we prove that AutoACER only requires the ranking of estimated causal effects to be correct across attributes to select the correct classifier.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie 等ICML 2021 · 被引用 1,773 次
- Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group InformationEvan Zheran Liu, Behzad Haghgoo, Annie S. Chen, Aditi Raghunathan 等ICML 2021 · 被引用 683 次
- Environment Inference for Invariant LearningElliot Creager, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Richard S. ZemelICML 2021 · 被引用 454 次
- Understanding the failure modes of out-of-distribution generalizationVaishnavh Nagarajan, Anders Andreassen, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 被引用 205 次
相关 Paper
- Controlling Learned Effects to Reduce Spurious Correlations in Text ClassifiersParikshit Bansal, Amit SharmaACL 2023 · 被引用 1 次
- Towards Robust Classification Model by Counterfactual and Invariant Data GenerationChun-Hao Chang, George-Alexandru Adam, Anna GoldenbergCVPR 2021
- Let Samples Speak: Mitigating Spurious Correlation by Exploiting the Clusterness of SamplesWeiwei Li, Junzhuo Liu, Yuanyuan Ren, Yuchen Zheng 等CVPR 2025
- Spuriousness-Aware Meta-Learning for Learning Robust ClassifiersGuangtao Zheng, Wenqian Ye, Aidong ZhangKDD 2024 · 被引用 3 次
- Breaking Correlation Shift via Conditional Invariant RegularizerMingyang Yi, Ruoyu Wang, Jiacheng Sun, Zhenguo Li 等ICLR 2023
