PMTUD is not Panacea: Revisiting IP Fragmentation Attacks against TCP
Xuewei Feng, Qi Li, Kun Sun, Ke Xu, Baojun Liu, Xiaofeng Zheng, Qiushi Yang, Haixin Duan, Zhiyun Qian
摘要
—There is a widespread belief that TCP is not vulner- able to IP fragmentation attacks since TCP performs the Path Maximum Transmission Unit Discovery (PMTUD) mechanism by default, which can avoid IP fragmentation by dynamically matching the maximum size of TCP segments with the maximum transmission unit (MTU) of the path from the originator to the destination. However, this paper reveals that TCP is in fact vulnerable to IP fragmentation attacks, which is contrary to the common belief. We conduct a systematic study on the complex interactions between IP fragmentation and TCP, and we discover two key situations under which IP fragmentation can still be triggered on TCP segments even if the originator performs PMTUD. First, when the next-hop MTU of an intermediate router is smaller than the originator’s acceptable minimum path MTU, TCP segments from the originator will be fragmented by the router. Second, when the originator’s path MTU values between the IP layer and the TCP layer are desynchronized due to a maliciously crafted ICMP error message, the originator could be tricked into fragmenting TCP segments. Once IP fragmentation on TCP segments could be falsely triggered, attackers can inject forged fragments into the victim connection to poison the target TCP traffic after successfully addressing practical issues of predicting IPID and deceiving TCP checksum. Our case studies on both HTTP and BGP demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of poisoning TCP-based applications via IP fragmentation. We also conduct a comprehensive evaluation to show that our attacks can cause serious damages in the real world. Finally, we propose countermeasures to mitigate malicious IP fragmentation on TCP segments and defeat the attacks.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper7
- Should I Trust You? Rethinking the Principle of Zone-Based Isolation DNS Bailiwick CheckingYuxiao Wu, Yunyi Zhang, Chaoyi Lu, Baojun LiuNDSS 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Detecting Unknown Encrypted Malicious Traffic in Real Time via Flow Interaction Graph AnalysisChuanpu Fu, Qi Li, Ke XuNDSS 2023
- Athena: Analyzing and Quantifying Side Channels of Transport Layer ProtocolsFeiyang Yu, Quan Zhou, Syed Rafiul Hussain, Danfeng ZhangUSENIX Security 2024
- FRAGJAM: DoS Attacks Using IP Reassembly CongestionYepeng Pan, Christian RossowUSENIX Security 2026
- Off-Path TCP Exploits: PMTUD Breaks TCP Connection Isolation in IP Address Sharing ScenariosXuewei Feng, Zhaoxi Li, Qi Li, Ziqiang Wang 等CCS 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper15
- Are We There Yet? On RPKI's Deployment and SecurityYossi Gilad, Avichai Cohen, Amir Herzberg, Michael Schapira 等NDSS 2017 · 被引用 108 次
- The use of TLS in Censorship CircumventionSergey Frolov, Eric WustrowNDSS 2019 · 被引用 97 次
- End-to-End Measurements of Email Spoofing AttacksHang Hu, Gang WangUSENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 94 次
- Network Hygiene, Incentives, and Regulation: Deployment of Source Address Validation in the InternetMatthew J. Luckie, Robert Beverly, Ryan Koga, Ken Keys 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 89 次
- Augur: Internet-Wide Detection of Connectivity DisruptionsPaul Pearce, Roya Ensafi, Frank Li, Nick Feamster 等S&P 2017 · 被引用 84 次
相关 Paper
- Off-Path TCP Exploits of the Mixed IPID AssignmentXuewei Feng, Chuanpu Fu, Qi Li, Kun Sun 等CCS 2020 · 被引用 39 次
- Attacking the Network Time ProtocolAanchal Malhotra, Isaac E. Cohen, Erik Brakke, Sharon GoldbergNDSS 2016 · 被引用 100 次
- ReDAN: An Empirical Study on Remote DoS Attacks against NAT NetworksXuewei Feng, Yuxiang Yang, Qi Li, Xingxiang Zhan 等NDSS 2025
- Exploiting Sequence Number Leakage: TCP Hijacking in NAT-Enabled Wi-Fi NetworksYuxiang Yang, Xuewei Feng, Qi Li, Kun Sun 等NDSS 2024
- Automated Attack Discovery in TCP Congestion Control Using a Model-guided ApproachSamuel Jero, Md. Endadul Hoque, David R. Choffnes, Alan Mislove 等NDSS 2018 · 被引用 46 次
