Contrastive losses as generalized models of global epistasis
David H. Brookes, Jakub Otwinowski, Sam Sinai
摘要
Fitness functions map large combinatorial spaces of biological sequences to properties of interest. Inferring these multimodal functions from experimental data is a central task in modern protein engineering. Global epistasis models are an effective and physically-grounded class of models for estimating fitness functions from observed data. These models assume that a sparse latent function is transformed by a monotonic nonlinearity to emit measurable fitness. Here we demonstrate that minimizing supervised contrastive loss functions, such as the Bradley-Terry loss, is a simple and flexible technique for extracting the sparse latent function implied by global epistasis. We argue by way of a fitness-epistasis uncertainty principle that the nonlinearities in global epistasis models can produce observed fitness functions that do not admit sparse representations, and thus may be inefficient to learn from observations when using a Mean Squared Error (MSE) loss (a common practice). We show that contrastive losses are able to accurately estimate a ranking function from limited data even in regimes where MSE is ineffective and validate the practical utility of this insight by demonstrating that contrastive loss functions result in consistently improved performance on benchmark tasks.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper2
- Tranception: Protein Fitness Prediction with Autoregressive Transformers and Inference-time RetrievalPascal Notin, Mafalda Dias, Jonathan Frazer, Javier Marchena-Hurtado 等ICML 2022 · 被引用 236 次
- Deep Extrapolation for Attribute-Enhanced GenerationAlvin Chan, Ali Madani, Ben Krause, Nikhil NaikNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 33 次
相关 Paper
- Non-identifiability and the Blessings of Misspecification in Models of Molecular FitnessEli N. Weinstein, Alan Nawzad Amin, Jonathan Frazer, Debora S. MarksNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 31 次
- Rethinking Reward Modeling in Preference-based Large Language Model AlignmentHao Sun, Yunyi Shen, Jean-Francois TonICLR 2025
- Energy-Based Preference Model Offers Better Offline Alignment than the Bradley-Terry Preference ModelYuzhong Hong, Hanshan Zhang, Junwei Bao, Hongfei Jiang 等ICML 2025
- What Does Preference Learning Recover from Pairwise Comparison Data?Rattana Pukdee, Nina Balcan, Pradeep RavikumarICML 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Score-Based Density Estimation from Pairwise ComparisonsPetrus Mikkola, Luigi Acerbi, Arto KlamiICLR 2026
