Lune

STOC2022顶会

Byzantine agreement in polynomial time with near-optimal resilience

Shang-En Huang, Seth Pettie, Leqi Zhu

2022年份
5被引次数
2顶会引用

摘要

It has been known since the early 1980s that Byzantine Agreement in the full information, asynchronous model is impossible to solve deterministically against even one crash fault [FLP85], but that it can be solved with probability 1 [Ben83], even against an adversary that controls the scheduling of all messages and corrupts up to f < n/3 players [Bra87]. The main downside of [Ben83, Bra87] is that they terminate in 2 Θ(n) rounds in expectation whenever f = Θ(n). King and Saia [KS16, KS18] developed a polynomial protocol (polynomial rounds, polynomial computation) that is resilient to f < (1.14 × 10 -9 )n Byzantine faults. The new idea in their protocol is to detect-and blacklist-coalitions of likely-bad players by analyzing the deviations of random variables generated by those players over many rounds. In this work we design a simple collective coin-flipping protocol such that if any coalition of faulty players repeatedly does not follow protocol, then they will eventually be detected by one of two simple statistical tests. Using this coin-flipping protocol, we solve Byzantine Agreement in a polynomial number of rounds, even in the presence of up to f < n/4 Byzantine faults. This comes close to the f < n/3 upper bound on the maximum number of faults [BT85, FLM86, LSP82].

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper2

问问它们各自怎么用它

它引用的顶会 Paper1

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖