Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols
Xiaoyu Cao, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang Gong
摘要
Local Differential Privacy (LDP) protocols enable an untrusted data collector to perform privacy-preserving data analytics. In particular, each user locally perturbs his/her data to preserve privacy before sending it to the data collector, who aggregates the perturbed data to obtain statistics of interest. Over the past several years, researchers from multiple communities--such as security, database, and theoretical computer science-- have proposed many LDP protocols. These studies mainly focused on improving the utility of the LDP protocols. However, the security of LDP protocols is largely unexplored. In this work, we aim to bridge this gap. We focus on LDP protocols for frequency estimation and heavy hitter identification, which are two basic data analytics tasks. Specifically, we show that an attacker can inject fake users into an LDP protocol and the fake users send carefully crafted data to the data collector such that the LDP protocol estimates high frequencies for certain items or identifies them as heavy hitters. We call our attacks data poisoning attacks. We theoretically and/or empirically show the effectiveness of our attacks. We also explore two countermeasures against our attacks. Our experimental results show that they can effectively defend against our attacks in some scenarios but have limited effectiveness in others, highlighting the needs for new defenses against our attacks.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper31
- Hidden Backdoors in Human-Centric Language ModelsShaofeng Li, Hui Liu, Tian Dong, Benjamin Zi Hao Zhao 等CCS 2021 · 被引用 108 次
- Differentially Private Histograms in the Shuffle Model from Fake UsersAlbert Cheu, Maxim ZhilyaevS&P 2022 · 被引用 40 次
- Orchard: Differentially Private Analytics at ScaleEdo Roth, Hengchu Zhang, Andreas Haeberlen, Benjamin C. PierceOSDI 2020 · 被引用 40 次
- On the Risks of Collecting Multidimensional Data Under Local Differential PrivacyHéber Hwang Arcolezi, Sébastien Gambs, Jean-François Couchot, Catuscia PalamidessiVLDB 2023 · 被引用 22 次
- LDPRecover: Recovering Frequencies from Poisoning Attacks Against Local Differential PrivacyXinyue Sun, Qingqing Ye, Haibo Hu, Jiawei Duan 等ICDE 2024 · 被引用 21 次
它引用的顶会 Paper17
- Trojaning Attack on Neural NetworksYingqi Liu, Shiqing Ma, Yousra Aafer, Wen-Chuan Lee 等NDSS 2018 · 被引用 1,377 次
- Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression LearningMatthew Jagielski, Alina Oprea, Battista Biggio, Chang Liu 等S&P 2018 · 被引用 867 次
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 被引用 629 次
- Heavy Hitter Estimation over Set-Valued Data with Local Differential PrivacyZhan Qin, Yin Yang, Ting Yu, Issa Khalil 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 344 次
- Locally Differentially Private Frequent Itemset MiningTianhao Wang, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaS&P 2018 · 被引用 196 次
相关 Paper
- Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Differentially Private Frequent Itemset Mining ProtocolsWei Tong, Haoyu Chen, Jiacheng Niu, Sheng ZhongCCS 2024 · 被引用 2 次
- Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Key-Value DataYongji Wu, Xiaoyu Cao, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2022
- Fine-grained Poisoning Attack to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Mean and Variance EstimationXiaoguang Li, Ninghui Li, Wenhai Sun, Neil Zhenqiang Gong 等USENIX Security 2023
- Fine-Grained Manipulation Attacks to Local Differential Privacy Protocols for Range QueryXinyu Li, Wenda Chen, Xuebin RenICDE 2026
- Mitigating Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential PrivacyXiaolin Li, Ninghui Li, Boyang Wang, Wenhai SunCCS 2025 · 被引用 1 次
