Did You Misclick? Reversing 5-Point Satisfaction Scales Causes Unintended Responses
Martin Pielot, Mario Callegaro
摘要
When fielding satisfaction questions, survey platforms offer the option to randomly reverse the response options. In this paper, we provide evidence that the use of this option leads to biased results. In Study 1, we show that reversing vertically oriented response options leads to significantly lower satisfaction ratings – from 90 to 82 percent in our case. Study 2 had survey respondents verify their response and found that on a reversed scale, the very-dissatisfied option was selected unintentionally in about half of the cases. The cause, shown by Study 3, is that survey respondents expect the positive option at the top and do not always pay sufficient attention to the question, combined with the similar spelling of satisfied and dissatisfied. To prevent unintentional responses from biasing the results, we recommend keeping the positive option at the top in vertically-oriented scales with visually-similar endpoint labels.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它相关 Paper
- Truncating the Y-Axis: Threat or Menace?Michael Correll, Enrico Bertini, Steven FranconeriCHI 2020 · 被引用 51 次
- Exploring the Quality, Efficiency, and Representative Nature of Responses Across Multiple Survey PanelsFrank Bentley, Kathleen O'Neill, Katie Quehl, Danielle M. LottridgeCHI 2020 · 被引用 21 次
- Race, Gender and Beauty: The Effect of Information Provision on Online Hiring BiasesWeiwen Leung, Zheng Zhang, Daviti Jibuti, Jinhao Zhao 等CHI 2020 · 被引用 24 次
- Incorporating Worker Perspectives into MTurk Annotation Practices for NLPOlivia Huang, Eve Fleisig, Dan KleinEMNLP 2023 · 被引用 1 次
- Truth or Square: Aspect Ratio Biases Recall of Position EncodingsCristina R. Ceja, Caitlyn M. McColeman, Cindy Xiong, Steven L. FranconeriIEEE VIS 2020 · 被引用 20 次
