Lune

CCS2026顶会

Rogue: Updatable Matrix Lookup Arguments and Applications to Verifiable Databases

Christodoulos Pappas, Zhuo Cai, Dimitrios Papadopoulos

出版方
2026年份

摘要

Proving the correctness of computations over a large dataset via succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (SNARKs) entails the large overhead of ``loading'' the dataset in the SNARK. However, certain computations may only need to access a small fraction of the dataset (e.g., a database query that only accesses a subset of table rows and then computes an aggregation function). The standard way of efficiently proving such computations is to use lookup arguments with sublinear prover complexity to load only necessary data to the SNARK. Unfortunately, all prior schemes are static: even a single change to the dataset forces the prover to re-run an expensive pre-processing step, linear to the dataset size. The only exemption is the recent work of Dutta et al., (CCS'24) that proposed a lookup argument with amortized sublinear updates---based on re-running the pre-processing phase periodically, when too many changes have been accumulated. In this work, we present Rogue, the first lookup argument with sublinear prover time and updates that always take time proportional only to the number of incurred changes. Indeed, Rogue is actually a matrix lookup argument, supporting entire row lookups in time proportional to the number of rows (and independent of their size)! It has very good practical performance, e.g., for a 220×272^{20}\times 2^7 matrix and 2102^{10} row accesses, Rogue achieves ×21\times 21-942942 and ×76\times 76-3000030000 faster lookups and updates, respectively, compared to prior works. We then use Rogue to build RogueDB, the first verifiable database system for arbitrary SQL queries that supports authenticated indexes, hence achieves prover time sublinear to the database. Compared with prior schemes with succinct proofs, vSQL (Zhang et al., IEEE S&P'17) and PoneglyphDB (Gu et al., SIGMOD'25), we get ×42.8\times 42.8-×8624.1\times 8624.1 and ×149.6\times 149.6-×11362.4\times 11362.4 faster prover times, for various SQL queries from the TPC-H benchmark.

问问这篇 Paper

问问你的智能体。

Lune 读过与它相关的顶会 Paper,每个回答都会注明依据哪几篇。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Lunesearch_papers

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖