Oops..! I Glitched It Again! How to Multi-Glitch the Glitching-Protections on ARM TrustZone-M
Xhani Marvin Saß, Richard Mitev, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi
摘要
Voltage Fault Injection (VFI), also known as power glitching, has proven to be a severe threat to real-world systems. In VFI attacks, the adversary disturbs the power-supply of the target-device forcing the device to illegitimate behavior. Various countermeasures have been proposed to address different types of fault injection attacks at different abstraction layers, either requiring to modify the underlying hardware or software/firmware at the machine instruction level. Moreover, only recently, individual chip manufacturers have started to respond to this threat by integrating countermeasures in their products. Generally, these countermeasures aim at protecting against single fault injection (SFI) attacks, since Multiple Fault Injection (MFI) is believed to be challenging and sometimes even impractical. In this paper, we present -Glitch, the first Voltage Fault Injection (VFI) platform which is capable of injecting multiple, coordinated voltage faults into a target device, requiring only a single trigger signal. We provide a novel flow for Multiple Voltage Fault Injection (MVFI) attacks to significantly reduce the search complexity for fault parameters, as the search space increases exponentially with each additional fault injection. We evaluate and showcase the effectiveness and practicality of our attack platform on four real-world chips, featuring TrustZone-M: The first two have interdependent backchecking mechanisms, while the second two have additionally integrated countermeasures against fault injection. Our evaluation revealed that -Glitch can successfully inject four consecutive faults within an average time of one day. Finally, we discuss potential countermeasures to mitigate VFI attacks and additionally propose two novel attack scenarios for MVFI.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper3
- Battering RAM: Low-Cost Interposer Attacks on Confidential Computing via Dynamic Memory AliasingJesse De Meulemeester, David F. Oswald, Ingrid Verbauwhede, Jo Van BulckS&P 2026 · 被引用 20 次
- BUSted!!! Microarchitectural Side-Channel Attacks on the MCU Bus InterconnectCristiano Rodrigues, Daniel Oliveira, Sandro PintoS&P 2024 · 被引用 15 次
- Faults in Our Bus: Novel Bus Fault Attack to Break ARM TrustZoneNimish Mishra, Anirban Chakraborty, Debdeep MukhopadhyayNDSS 2024
它引用的顶会 Paper7
- Hacking in Darkness: Return-oriented Programming against Secure EnclavesJae-Hyuk Lee, Jin Soo Jang, Yeongjin Jang, Nohyun Kwak 等USENIX Security 2017 · 被引用 191 次
- VoltPillager: Hardware-based fault injection attacks against Intel SGX Enclaves using the SVID voltage scaling interfaceZitai Chen, Georgios Vasilakis, Kit Murdock, Edward Dean 等USENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 127 次
- Hardware-Backed Heist: Extracting ECDSA Keys from Qualcomm's TrustZoneKeegan RyanCCS 2019 · 被引用 90 次
- Understanding the Security of ARM Debugging FeaturesZhenyu Ning, Fengwei ZhangS&P 2019 · 被引用 41 次
- V0LTpwn: Attacking x86 Processor Integrity from SoftwareZijo Kenjar, Tommaso Frassetto, David Gens, Michael Franz 等USENIX Security 2020
相关 Paper
- VoltJockey: Breaching TrustZone by Software-Controlled Voltage Manipulation over Multi-core FrequenciesPengfei Qiu, Dongsheng Wang, Yongqiang Lyu, Gang QuCCS 2019 · 被引用 124 次
- Plug Your Volt: Protecting Intel Processors against Dynamic Voltage Frequency Scaling based Fault AttacksNimish Mishra, Rahul Arvind Mool, Anirban Chakraborty, Debdeep MukhopadhyayDAC 2024 · 被引用 3 次
- One Glitch to Rule Them All: Fault Injection Attacks Against AMD's Secure Encrypted VirtualizationRobert Buhren, Hans Niklas Jacob, Thilo Krachenfels, Jean-Pierre SeifertCCS 2021
- Minefield: A Software-only Protection for SGX Enclaves against DVFS AttacksAndreas Kogler, Daniel Gruss, Michael SchwarzUSENIX Security 2022
- XCFI: Comprehensive Control-Flow Integrity for Arm TrustZone-MYunju Gu, Jaeyeol Park, Donghyun KwonUSENIX Security 2026
